Very clear and organised structure\n\nClear examples to support learning objectives\n\nAttractive use of voice\n\nOne point for improvement: Do not film while the lecturer is still refinding breath
Useful to build basic knowledge which helps you choosing a better mode and linking the objectives of research with the tools (how).\n\nThanks to the instructor and Coursera.
創建者 Suzanne M O•
Very basic overview. A nice course to set up the rest of the courses in this specialization on Survey Design and Analysis.
創建者 AMINA I•
Most interesting aspect is the Quality Perspective : It provides a pictorial view of measurement and representation.
創建者 Tony, O L H•
Quite a dry topic to listen through, but good coverage on formula, total error framework & global survey examples.
創建者 Sue W Y•
Content is different from what I expected. In the Course title perhaps should have emphasize that the Course
創建者 David D•
I enjoyed the MOOC very much but it somehow did not provide clear enough definitions of key concepts
創建者 Edema O•
Many questions in the quizzes could have been framed better. Some were confusing in their wording.
創建者 Camila B•
I think the videos could be more dynamic, however, the course is very structured.
創建者 Kathleen j D•
It was average, good to get a summary before diving into more in depth classes
Maybe too much content. Not really didactic, a bit boring.
Gives a basic overview of data collection processes.
創建者 Solomon L•
The instructor is not audible enough.
創建者 Saifur R•
I did not find it very interesting
創建者 Monica N A•
the materials in this course in week 1, 2, and 3 were useful, however, week 4 was not interesting for me and the examples of the surveys shouldn't be tested in the Quiz (Why do we need to memorize every survey's characteristics?)
Also, the instructor was very slow, that i had to speed up the video to 1.50 - her tone of voice and presentation skills are very poor.
創建者 Matt H•
The journal articles are boring and difficult to follow due to the scant instruction and background given in the lectures. I would certainly prefer more grounding in the basics via text book chapters or more detailed lecture instruction. The journal articles are only meaningful once a stronger foundation of basics has been established.
創建者 Md. N H•
The instructions were so slow and the delivery was nothing like continuous. It was difficult to keep track of the lecture and keep listening. I had a hard time listening through the lectures and complete it.
The curriculum focus to much on survey and provides to little information of existing sources e.g. OECD, World Bank, etc. Additionally, it felt like a 4 week promotion for the indepth courses.
創建者 Laxdip P•
The course content was good but teaching method was too poor to understand. First time little disappointment by coursera.com
創建者 Pieter v d H•
Content OK, didactics poor.
創建者 sana k•
Couldn't stay interested
創建者 Hong I C•
Although I'm willing to sit through the entire specialization (the rest of the courses are taught by different professors), I am confident to argue that the first course was terrible.
The sloppiness of the presentation and course structure ruined most of the modules covered in the course, except for the first one. The rest needs some retouching and reconfiguring. Overall, the course was like listening to mumbo-jumbo and listing of a bunch of loosely-related materials.
The instructor needs to be the cohesive force that unites the scattered information. Otherwise, none of the contents stick in the learner's memory.
Besides, the tests were horrible. Didn't really test on any useful information. It was a test for the sake of testing.
創建者 Morgan S•
This course is extremely hard to follow, not because of the content but because of the delivery. Presentation, "visuals", word choice, speed, all very poor. I'm in week 3 and EVERY video has been just as difficult to follow.
Quizzes are hard to understand and ask you about things that weren't of any actual value to the course, and/or weren't even covered. Also, because multiple answers are required for each question, you are basically answering a 4 part question that is only worth 1 point. Get one part wrong and you miss the whole 1 point.
創建者 Nehleen A•
Extremely boring. I initially wanted to go for the 7 course certification but now I don't think that I will even finish this class, let alone go for the certification. A bad move for UMD and UMICH to make this class to be the first one to be taken for the certification. Most people will not consider this is worth their time especially when there are so many more interesting and freeclasses are available through Coursera, EDX and Udacity,
創建者 Jessica R B•
The emphasis on all the specifics of these surveys is not useful. People are taking this course with various goals in mind, knowing the specifics of random surveys is not one of them.
創建者 Divya K•
AWFUL monotonous way of talking. I have such a great interest in this topic, but listening to her makes me want to rip my eyeballs out.
創建者 Samuel F•
This class provided very little useful information. The lectures were not clear.