Chevron Left
返回到 实用安全

學生對 马里兰大学帕克分校 提供的 实用安全 的評價和反饋

4.6
2,298 個評分
566 條評論

課程概述

This course focuses on how to design and build secure systems with a human-centric focus. We will look at basic principles of human-computer interaction, and apply these insights to the design of secure systems with the goal of developing security measures that respect human performance and their goals within a system....

熱門審閱

IR

Jun 21, 2016

I like how in depth this gets. it explains it very well an in ways for people who are starting off in this field to get a basic understanding in exactly what we are learning. very well put together!

BH

Jun 30, 2020

hi there,FIrst of all i'd like to thank our instructor , Jennifer Golbeck, for the hard working and the amazing way of teaching . I really love the course, thanks you very much and keep it up *-^ .

篩選依據:

501 - 实用安全 的 525 個評論(共 554 個)

創建者 heer v

Mar 24, 2019

grate eaxplanation...

創建者 Mohanad E

May 21, 2017

It's a good course

創建者 Oladapo O A

Dec 11, 2016

Very Good course

創建者 Netho J K L

Jul 23, 2020

It's verry good

創建者 Aritra C

Apr 11, 2020

Greate to learn

創建者 Morten V C

Oct 20, 2019

Very usefull.

創建者 Rishi P T

Mar 03, 2020

Basic things

創建者 ikwak

Oct 03, 2017

Thanks! :)

創建者 Ajay

May 23, 2020

good

創建者 Shriram

Mar 23, 2020

good

創建者 Inna T

Apr 18, 2020

This course does not cover a lot of content and has more connection do design and HCI rather than security. There is no support in discussions, no discussions. There is only one assignment and it says in the instructions you will be able to upload a screenshot. Apparently that feature was forgotten because you can’t, you need to use an outside service and paste a link. There are words in reading that were supposed to be URLs but don’t work (like it says “click here” but “here” is not a link). The course feels sloppy and not very useful.

創建者 Ricardo L C T

Aug 07, 2018

confusing, low quality of video discussions, low quality of presenters on the felling they are not prepared to discuss in the panel. low quality of quiz with question not covered. asked to read a very long paper about SSL that is a research of a class study not relevant for the informative intent of the course. took me too much time for me to read and I gave up the SSL paper.

創建者 Amarender B

Jun 17, 2017

Contents seems repeatative . Also When you already discussing the PDF contents in video lecture, I don't see asking to complete PDF reading before video lecture. I have spent reading the doc and felt I could complete the course much faster if i could skip reading some big PDFs. Otherwise it is good.

創建者 Rob C

Jan 23, 2018

There are some questions that can be debated for clarity. Example: A company creates a password V^$5t.b2. Is this easy to crack no. But the question ALSO says it's given to the employee on a piece of paper. Is this easy? Yes, there's paper laying around with passwords on them.

創建者 Burak İ

Aug 08, 2020

The course is so old. Even the concept is still the same, the versions of applications that takes part in the videos are really old. The versions of gmail that took part in some week's lecture seems at least 3-4 years old.

創建者 Jacek E

Nov 01, 2019

Well prepared and interesting lectures. However, for a intermediate course, I've expected more comprehensive content. Let's see what the next courses for the cybersecurity specialization have to offer.

創建者 Johnny O

May 13, 2016

Videos with guest speakers were unhelpful. Also, quizzes were not accurate and poorly written questions.

創建者 Jeroen R

Apr 24, 2016

OK, but not really in-depth. Still has useful pointers, but they could be summarized on an A4 sheet.

創建者 Piotr M

Nov 12, 2017

The course was really good when played at 1.5x speed, at the normal pace it was really too slow.

創建者 Ivan

Sep 08, 2017

Good course, but not really what I expected.

All materials are common things and knowledge.

創建者 Tom G

Jul 14, 2018

Some good info, but the course needs to be updated to correct long known mistakes.

創建者 Mian A J

Aug 10, 2020

Content was a little boring. Secondly, Voice quality wasn't up to the mark.

創建者 Daniel K P

Oct 20, 2019

Needs more content ; present course repeats

information, too often

創建者 Giulio B

Jul 25, 2020

Very little useful information

創建者 Alberto R

Nov 21, 2016

Useful concepts. Quite simple.