Engaging presentation and food for thoughts. Although high level, I found the course worthwhile even as an experienced software engineer.
This course helped me to generate interactive classroom through the use of SDLC, and formative assessment and feedback.
創建者 Shikha D•
創建者 Gouri P•
Very nice 😊
創建者 Amr H•
創建者 Ashwini G•
創建者 Joel M M•
創建者 Shyam P•
創建者 SADARAM A R B•
創建者 sowmya t•
創建者 Mathew S B•
創建者 Saranya S k•
創建者 Don M•
This was an interesting course because it clearly defined terminology about software development. It is so common to hear catch phrases used out of context when people talk about security and design. Now I have better understanding to know when the words are used in a proper context.
創建者 Naveen B•
This course looks very basic if you are already worked on any one of requirements, design, implementation, or testing teams. more details can be included for user
創建者 Anderson F e S•
A basic course but worth for gain the initial insights about the design and software development lifecycle.
創建者 Mohammad I K•
Some question of week 4 were included in the practice assessment quiz in week 3. This needs to be fixed.
創建者 Patrick L•
Some questions appeared before the content was taught. But the instructor is fantastic!
創建者 KHUSHBOO J•
It give the good understanding of software designing elements and their life cycle.
創建者 Desabandhu P•
Some questions displayed in practice quiz do found earlier before the lecture
創建者 Shaaban S M•
Good course . But need more details about tools . Methods ...
good n getting clear knowledge about sdlc thank u
創建者 121810310004 K S•
really helped me improve my skills
創建者 Teplov A V•
創建者 Марина Р•
To be honest
This is the most lazily created course I ever met (not only on coursera)
Do you really think I didn't read wikipedia page about Software design before enrolling a specialization related to it?
Videos are full of superficial information, nothing applicable.
Some pictures in the lectures have low resolution and almost anreadable, one lecture has at least 10 seconds of dying UPS sound in background.
Quizes are awful they don't check understanding, but how I remembered in which year waterfall was created. And the Idea of creating 5 more quizes from random subsets of the same set of questions is really bad idea.
I comparing this one with specialization of University of Alberta and I'm surprised by such big difference in knowledge thy provide
Hope so much other three courses of this specialization are much better than this one.
創建者 Refah A•
the videos weren't that much informative and the ideas discussed seemed to be irrelevant with each other, hopefully the next course in the specialization will be informative enough to me
創建者 Robin S S•
I can't recommend this course. The videos are fine, but nothing you couldn't look up on youtube. The quizes aren't helpful for learning and there's no other ways to "test" what you learn. One week's "external readings" just points to a wikipedia page. There's nothing here you couldn't learn for free on youtube or blog sites.