Chevron Left
返回到 Management Fundamentals

學生對 宾夕法尼亚大学 提供的 Management Fundamentals 的評價和反饋

4.7
419 個評分

課程概述

People are the most valuable asset of any business, but they are also the most unpredictable, and the most difficult asset to manage. And although managing people well is critical to the health of any organization, most managers don't get the training they need to make good management decisions. Now, award-winning authors and renowned management Professors Mike Useem and Peter Cappelli of the Wharton School have designed this course to introduce you to the key elements of managing people. Based on their popular course at Wharton, this course will teach you how to motivate individual performance and design reward systems, how to design jobs and organize work for high performance, how to make good and timely management decisions, and how to design and change your organization’s architecture. By the end of this course, you'll have developed the skills you need to start motivating, organizing, and rewarding people in your organization so that you can thrive as a business and as a social organization....

熱門審閱

SG

2020年5月6日

The professors used real-life examples to prove their points, making the content very relatable. The quizzes were helpful and challenging, as well. Overall, a genuinely excellent course!

CE

2021年11月16日

I've taken a lot of management courses but this one felt uniquely beneficial. I took a lot of notes not because I needed them to pass the quizzes but because I wanted them for life.

篩選依據:

76 - Management Fundamentals 的 81 個評論(共 81 個)

創建者 hiranmayee p

2020年1月24日

genuine course.

創建者 Zhang J

2020年7月8日

Good! love it.

創建者 Alberto M

2020年5月14日

Very useful

創建者 Marieu

2019年8月26日

Would suggest that the slides and the speech are related a 100% so yo can follow what they explain

創建者 Sandy M S

2019年9月15日

it needs to be more interesting

創建者 Sasha K

2020年5月20日

Some good content but the "lectures" are terribly communicated. There is no clear thought hierarchy and example "stories" go on for ages with an unequal return of learning points. Overall disappointing, especially considering the prestigious source.