I understand why most of the students are furious about, but content wise, it one of those extremely helpful and important courses in Coursera. Really loved it!
Laurence cares deeply about the students. Not only about what they learn, but that they actually enjoy and learn it. What a fantastic teacher.
創建者 Alfian A H•
創建者 Muhammad T•
創建者 Mr. J•
創建者 Insyiraah O A•
創建者 mochammad g r•
創建者 Levina A•
創建者 Mellania P S•
創建者 Indah D S•
創建者 Egi R T•
創建者 Al F N P M•
創建者 Ahmad H N•
創建者 Ming G•
創建者 Cees R•
I liked the topic and instruction of this course. I had bumped onto the notion of datasets earlier, was impatient as I needed to just resolve an issue, and skipped it. Next time I know what they are about and will be able - and happy - to use (including build) them.
Slight minus: presentation in the video often contained some bullets that I couldn't connect to the speech, that is, I had to choose: read or listen.
Bummer: the last week's exercise effectively required to copy-paste from a notebook that was scrolled through in the video. That is silly enough in itself. What is more, for certain errors in the created code in the notebook, the grader gave a standard notification that was not helpful in resolving the identifying what coding error had been made. As the discussion showed, a good number of people - me including - had been struggling with this to the level of feeling helpless to resolve it.
Still four stars for instructional value of the whole course, but I hope for the sake of future students that the above mentioned exercise will be replaced by a better one.
創建者 Matej M•
This course was much better than the two before. Here were real exercises you had to do. It was not just about watching the videos. Topic itself was kind of boring. But the quality much better than others. Also on the discussion forum you were able to search for help.
創建者 Yopi P O•
Debugging exercises due to errors in indentation sounded stupid in the first place. But the joy of finally getting a "yes" in the assignment auto-grader beats them all.
創建者 Vinay M•
Was not that much engaging because the lectures were not linked properly and were lacking examples to support the content
創建者 Ruan V•
Excellent content, but the design of Exercise 4 tainted the experience somewhat by the end.
創建者 Gregor S•
Great explanation, however I believe in Week3 there are some broken links . . .heart.csv
創建者 Md S H C•
Would be a 5-start if the last assignment was a bit well thought out.
創建者 Mario A C S•
Last week exercise is problematic and not that educational
創建者 Chow K M•
Coding exercises were generally straightforward.
創建者 Elyasaf E•
More and better explanations are needed
創建者 Chuong L•
week 4 wasn't very clear
創建者 Yong M L•
This course is really interesting during the start, because there are a lot of hands-on for us to play around with the code. It shows the capability of TensorFlow as a Machine Learning framework which can also be used for data preprocessing before the model training.
However, the Assignments were very poorly designed in my opinion. I relied heavily on the discussion forums to pass the Assignments. It seems like a bug to me when you need to navigate through the Jupyter workspace to find the Week 5 notebook, then modify the codes from there and submit it to pass the Week 4 assignment.
創建者 İlkin H•
Course content deserves 5 starts. Really nice and very useful tutorial. But assignments are not as good as the content. There are very less explanation , many mistakes ( specially at the last assignment, because of typo, you may submit several times) , no expected outcome to control before submitting (evaluation time of third assignment took around 30 minutes for me).