Chevron Left
返回到 逻辑学导论

學生對 斯坦福大学 提供的 逻辑学导论 的評價和反饋

601 個評分
139 條評論


This course is an introduction to Logic from a computational perspective. It shows how to encode information in the form of logical sentences; it shows how to reason with information in this form; and it provides an overview of logic technology and its applications - in mathematics, science, engineering, business, law, and so forth....



Pros:\n\n1.good contents\n\n2.good exercises and interesting puzzles\n\n3.good examples\n\nCons:\n\n1.No video\n\n2. need more examples


excellent teaching, detailed analysis, interesting theories, mind blowing facts, all in all it was my best experience online


76 - 逻辑学导论 的 100 個評論(共 132 個)

創建者 Tage M


Great introduction to logic.

One thing I'd have appreciated to see is a set of accompanying recorded video lectures. My experience is that I find it easier in term of efforts and faster in term of time to absorb taught concepts when I engage both my hearing and sight senses while watching a lecture than reading only.

創建者 Chunping X


The course is well structured and I've learned some valuable concepts of logic. That said there're two thing I thought could be made better.

In some chapters, it's short of examples as explanation.

No introduction of how to use Fitch tool that could cause frustration for some who are new to it.

創建者 Sihyung L


Some concepts in Week 9 were not very understandable, but other weeks were good. I thank all who have contributed and prepared this course. I wish that in the next version of this course, there are some exercises using real-world logic tools, such as SAT solvers.

創建者 Ian A


This is a really good course. My only issue was I found some of the weeks quite a bit harder than others. It was helpful to look at the notes for each week in advance to figure out which ones would be tougher and allow for that.

創建者 David G M


I struggled real hard with some proofs. The main problem was the lack of examples or tutorials on how to use the rules of inference. Perhaps one or two videos could help??

創建者 Yiye D


Somehow difficult in the last several weeks. As almost all the materials are all in words, students may sometimes feel bored seeing all lines and complex tables.

創建者 Samuel O


I feel like some things could have been explained better, maybe a better description of how the fitch tool worked. Other than that, it was a great course!

創建者 Chatziiosifidis A


Very interesting course

But some parts are not just to technical but rather for technicians and not for persons looking more into the theoretical aspects

創建者 Supinder S


Course is fine but there isn't much material for INTRODUCTION. Good Math Skills Required.

創建者 Voo T V


Videos to explain the materials would be much more useful than how it is right now...

創建者 Krzysztof M


The Fitch tool can be easily hacked if now premise are in the task. Please fix this!

創建者 Francisco J M M


This has been a very interesting course, introducing the basic of logic reasoning.

創建者 Kit H M


The course is great, but the grading system is always broken.

創建者 liu-xuezhi



創建者 廖晨辰


A little difficult to understand.

創建者 Ahmed



創建者 Dhruv A


Quite engaging for a predominantly text-based course. However, what I struggled with towards the end was determining application areas for the theory that I was going through. After completing the proofs of Week 8, I lost momentum and the drive to want to imbibe more theory without any outlet for application. This is obviously not to say that there aren't application areas. However, the course can do more to communicate those to the students.

創建者 Eugenio L


I have found it not extremely clear in the latter part of the course, perhaps more examples would help. Most of the section 1 to 9 (from propositional logic to relational logic and Herbrand logic) are quite clear and straight-forward. An historical background of who, when and why theories and computing methodologies were elaborated would certainly increase interest.

創建者 Roger C


I love the content overall. However, I'm very disappointed that there are no video lectures at all. Ironically, I could find some old video lectures of this course on YouTube. The difficulty of this course warrants video lectures to convey many concepts and techniques, such as the Fitch system.

Hopefully you can add video lectures back to this course.

創建者 Soledad A


As someone who learns by doing I found the lack of examples to explain certain concepts really frustrating, and whenever examples were provided they were usually really simplistic compared to the graded exercises that we were expected to solve. It was also really difficult (impossible) to get answers from mentors in the discussion forums.

創建者 Anas M


Video demonstrations would have been more helpful. I like to feel engaged, lectured to and encouraged to communicate with fellow students. I feel that this class really helped me a lot, but then I began to lose interest very quickly because of its format.

創建者 Luis J


Unfortunately there are several problems with the external tool, although the course is very complete, the presentations of the slides are very short, they would need more development, to be more friendly with the reader.

創建者 Digby D


A solid entry-level course about Formal Logic. May be more enticing to students intimidated by the more math-based approach of Intro to Mathematical Thinking (also by Stanford University).

創建者 Wukunzhi


the examples are far from enough! For a non-native speaker,it's quite hard to learn all these notions .please add some examples into it !

創建者 Thomas R


Bare bones. Pros: mostly clear, Cons: it may require outside supplements to fully understand and complete the assignments.