Chevron Left
返回到 软件产品管理导论

學生對 阿尔伯塔大学 提供的 软件产品管理导论 的評價和反饋

4.6
5,508 個評分
1,032 條評論

課程概述

This course highlights the importance and role of software product management. It also provides an overview of the specialization, as well as its goals, structure, and expectations. The course explains the value of process, requirements, planning, and monitoring in producing better software....

熱門審閱

NK

Jan 11, 2019

The course was very interactive, useful and interesting. I can definitely apply the knowledge that I gained out of this course to my day on day work on Software Management. Kudos to the production and

ED

Feb 19, 2018

Though it is an introductory course, it is packed with great information about managing a software product. I enjoyed the course, and I am moving on with the next course on the SPM specialization.

篩選依據:

951 - 软件产品管理导论 的 975 個評論(共 1,008 個)

創建者 Jadielly F O T

Nov 21, 2017

Falta insumos mais recentes sobre product management.

創建者 Johan J

Oct 23, 2015

A bit 'light' on content but ok for an introduction.

創建者 P Y R

Aug 26, 2019

learn more about Software Project Management

創建者 Emilio F

Feb 06, 2016

Maybe not enough content to be a course.

創建者 Magdalena

Oct 12, 2017

to fast but good additional resources

創建者 Nishant R

Feb 18, 2017

A decent introduction to the topic.

創建者 Agustin E S

Jun 17, 2016

Cobertura superficial de los temas

創建者 Andrew B

Mar 02, 2016

Very simple course introduction.

創建者 Nithin S

Dec 26, 2016

Could be more in depth

創建者 Konstantin K

Aug 22, 2017

Content is too common

創建者 Roman H

Nov 21, 2015

Course about courses

創建者 Steven G

Dec 15, 2016

Not so inpiring

創建者 David D

Jan 04, 2019

Very remedial.

創建者 Jane S

Mar 30, 2019

Too simple.

創建者 Marc H

Dec 04, 2015

quite short

創建者 Комиренко М

Jul 26, 2017

Much water

創建者 Hussein H

Mar 07, 2016

Very basic

創建者 Valeria

Nov 25, 2015

very basic

創建者 Arkadiusz

Nov 08, 2015

It is ok.

創建者 Vasileva T

Aug 23, 2019

basic

創建者 Néstor d J M G

Mar 24, 2016

..

創建者 Daria S

Jun 20, 2020

I will continue watching the courses in the Specialization, hoping that maybe the next ones will be useful. But overall, I would say that they course is not really oriented at the real world. I appreciate the quality of the videos and the animations. But the purpose of the animations and the concept of the course are still not clear to me. Course seems to pay a lot of attention to the Agile without clearly explaining how Agile works. Seems to be almost a commercial to the Agile approach, without any good argument why should you use it.

I found quizzes, in-video questions and animations to be barely relatable to the course. Most of the things that are asked in the quizzes are not explicitly explained throughout the course, answers have to be rather guessed that learnt or extrapolated.

Also, in real world, SPM job requires not just the knowledge of the waterlike theory, but a lot of tech skills that are not mentioned in the course.

創建者 Allen J

Apr 18, 2017

The course seems to be a course in Scrummerfall, i.e., a mixture of Scrum and Waterfall. After having briefly discussed the Agile Manifesto, which emphasizes things like "People over processes," what is the first thing that they dive into? Processes where they say things like "Requirements combined with processes are the backbone of any successful software project." I would disagree. Requirements and processes are important, but people and communications are the backbone of any successful software project.

I'm dropping this specialization and searching for another course that really follows Agile methodologies.

創建者 Jose B

Feb 07, 2018

The instructors seem like they are reading from a teleprompter, and it feels like they are robots. Also very bad transition editing between scenes. All instructors should use more body language, and explain the info as if they where giving a life class, not some verbatim script. Other than that is fine.

創建者 Boris S

Mar 24, 2016

Only the link agilemanifesto.org has real value in this course. The rest is self-PR and "water". I see no reason paying for the sertificate and I am not convinced further cources of this specialization will deliver greater value.