t

very

Lectures are excellent -- clear presentation from three professors with great sound -- easy to understand. Video of interviews from people who are convicted of fraud are fascinating. However, in an attempt to make the testing portion appropriately challenging and less open to cheating the multiple choice questions can be really obscure or oversimplified to the point of being wrong.

I'm disappointed in the online discussions -- NOT the fault of the course -- they seem to be improving their accounting knowledge while working full time and English is a second language so there isn't much posting, there's very little dialogue between students. I do appreciate Vincenzo Ferri's role as monitor -- it helps connect us.

Content I think was rudimentary and lacked the depth required for Forensic Accounting. Moreover, Test Questions were hard to understand as they were not articulated well. In some cases the selection may have been the write answer, but not the best answer. Discussion work was not always based on the topics covered, which was sometimes disappointing. Lastly, it appears that some students did not participate in the discussion work. While I realize it was optional, it appears some students did not apply effort.

The course only provides a theoretical introduction, it would be good it courses introduce practical techniques and analysis methods, only then can they become truly useful for students.

Plenty of useful information. However, the whole course was based mostly on theory with case studies, and did not offer any practical and/or technical skills.

Old video, bad russian transcription. Incorrect questions

Muy por encima todos los temas. No me ha gustado

I was sent mail initially stating i will get certificate free of cost. when i completed, i am being asked to pay. I dont have zero grade to rate.