Chevron Left
返回到 法务会计及欺诈检查

學生對 西弗吉尼亚大学 提供的 法务会计及欺诈检查 的評價和反饋

4.7
3,979 個評分
1,184 條評論

課程概述

Everyday across the world, thousands of businesses are victimized by fraud. Who commits these bad acts? Why? And, how? In this course we are going to help you answer the questions: who commits fraud, why and how. We’ll also help you develop skills for catching them....

熱門審閱

AO
2020年6月16日

This course is one of a kind, it's simple, professional and straight to point. I've really been exposed to the concept of fraud and it's dynamics. This will take me a long way in my career.\n\nCheers!

AS
2020年4月25日

Excellent course to go with an excellent illustration from experts in the industries. I do carry a value which will cherished in my memory for ever ........\n\nThanks for all what i learned hear.....

篩選依據:

1176 - 法务会计及欺诈检查 的 1196 個評論(共 1,196 個)

創建者 LESLIE N L

2020年8月10日

The quizzes and the exam called for knowledge not presented. Good information though.

創建者 Damon D

2020年12月6日

Has some solid information but is really lacking without the accompanying text.

創建者 Jakousi U C

2017年9月25日

Se siente como un infocomercial. It feels like a commercial.

創建者 Gnananandan

2020年8月23日

Can be more diagrammatically represented

創建者 faris a

2021年4月17日

It was fantastic and helpful course

創建者 Stefan A

2020年5月20日

Good introduction into the Topic.

創建者 Nyoike D

2020年12月11日

very well structured

創建者 Magno M S d S

2017年1月4日

Kinda superficial...

創建者 Mark A U

2016年2月19日

t

very

創建者 kristy d

2019年1月23日

Lectures are excellent -- clear presentation from three professors with great sound -- easy to understand. Video of interviews from people who are convicted of fraud are fascinating. However, in an attempt to make the testing portion appropriately challenging and less open to cheating the multiple choice questions can be really obscure or oversimplified to the point of being wrong.

I'm disappointed in the online discussions -- NOT the fault of the course -- they seem to be improving their accounting knowledge while working full time and English is a second language so there isn't much posting, there's very little dialogue between students. I do appreciate Vincenzo Ferri's role as monitor -- it helps connect us.

創建者 Ong J W

2016年3月15日

Too qualitative, too much theory, narrative.

Needs more specific examples of how numbers are manipulated for e.g. in financial statement fraud. Perhaps show real data on how outlier transactions are spotted.

創建者 UJJWAL G

2020年5月13日

Very bad quiz as the options were terrible and did not have a clear justified answer. I could point out many MCQs which had more than 1 correct answer without an "all of the above" option.

創建者 Radha A

2021年10月5日

The course only provides a theoretical introduction, it would be good it courses introduce practical techniques and analysis methods, only then can they become truly useful for students.

創建者 Chain F

2021年7月15日

Really, you can substitute the course with googling: "fraud motvation models", "benford's law" and "fraud demografics". That would be much faster and less tedious.

創建者 Darko I

2020年6月2日

Plenty of useful information. However, the whole course was based mostly on theory with case studies, and did not offer any practical and/or technical skills.

創建者 Eric J

2020年8月20日

Most garbage and horrible course I have taken by far for accounting so far. The course has too many videos and the information is too repetitive and I got very bored. My enthusiasm was killed in week 2. The final part is 60 questions and it was shocking and disappointing. The final exam should not have 60 questions because I find that ridiculous and that it is too much and I unrolled this course as soon as I saw how many questions on the final for week 5. Execution is the worst thing I have saw by far. This course is so disappointing and could have been better. I give this course a 1 star out of 5. I wish I could rate this course a 0 out of 5 stars because really this course was seriously boring and depressing.

創建者 Marcus K

2019年9月8日

The quiz questions where absolutely terribly phrased and the course lacked actual technical knowledge. It was too broad, lacked actual investigative part and had too big of an emphasis on theories and history.

創建者 Shrikanth M

2020年9月27日

I was sent mail initially stating i will get certificate free of cost. when i completed, i am being asked to pay. I dont have zero grade to rate.

創建者 t. p

2016年12月11日

exam questions are designed for raw facts instead of critical thinking and resoning. Sorry maybe its my poor english. Regards.

創建者 Simon G

2017年6月2日

Poorly written and vague questions and answers. Repeated questions in the final exam. Outdated examples of fraud.

創建者 🍞

2018年2月16日

too basic