課程概述
熱門審閱
Professor does a great job and in explaining the complexities. He does not take any partisan stand and does a great job and giving prominence to all sides of the argument. Enjoyed the course throughly
This course was very didactic and easy to understand. I liked the way that the different theories about each subject were presented, allowing me to build my own opinion and perspective on each matter.
201 - 宪法关键概念和最高法院案例介绍 的 225 個評論（共 252 個）
創建者 motaz i
•thanks teacher ! :)
創建者 Erich Y
•Splendid Excellent
創建者 Ahmer J K
•Excellent course!
創建者 Athina S
•Excellent course!
創建者 Jorge F P M
•Excelente curso.
創建者 Jonathan L S
•A great course!
創建者 MAURO F D S
•Excelente curso
創建者 Siyao L
•amazing course！
創建者 Amanda H
•amazing course
創建者 Janusz D
•Great course.
創建者 Shirley K
•great course!
創建者 Paulo F V
•Excelente!!
創建者 José L T d A
•muito bom.
創建者 CORINA S
•Enjoyed it
創建者 Lukasz J B
•Excellent!
創建者 Guilherme H C P
•Muito Bom
創建者 Jhonatan A T B
•Great!!!!
創建者 Nicole P
•Amazing!
創建者 Md. Z R
•Best One
創建者 Asante A
•GREAT
創建者 Robert T R
•Easy
創建者 Berat T
•EXCE
創建者 Hunter S
•YES
創建者 Natalie E
•G
創建者 Timothy K
•I think overall this a great course for those looking for a refresher of the foundations of the constitution and bill of rights or those looking for a comprehensive introduction. Personally, I took this course so I could reinforce things I have studied before. As for the pros, I really liked how the course went through each amendment and contextualized it through case examples. There were some cases that I had not previously heard about. For instance, the cases that prompted the exclusionary rule of the fourth amendment. Moreover, the professor did an excellent job at presenting both sides of constitutional arguments which conflict Supreme Court justices. For the most part, the professor was very straight-forward in his explanations although there were times where he seemed to go off on a tangent. In particular, Week 4's lecture on campaign finance didn't really go into detail about the issue but rather just seemed to ramble. So that brings me to my cons. I thought the professor's demeanor was a bit too contrived so I think it would have been great if maybe he had another person (perhaps a student?) who he was interacting with to make it more of a natural presentation. In addition, one of the major downsides were the supplementary tasks or lack thereof. Most of the course was passive learning in which you are just watching lecture after lecture. I would have given the course a 5-star rating had there been sequential discussions with content-related prompts. I have seen these in other courses and I find them a great way to reinforce concepts and see how other people perceived the content. While there were quizzes, I didn't find the quizzes useful in retaining key concepts. They were overly specific more about facts than concept comprehension. It would have been better if questions were posed as hypothetical situations and the quiz-taker had to decide which amendments or clauses this relates to. I think this might be a better way to gauge whether students comprehended the concepts rather than the specific content. Overall, however, it was a course that was both a comprehensive and concise overview of the constitution as it relates to the Supreme Court. I definitely feel like my knowledge on this has been expanded. I now see the 14th amendment as one of the most significant and contentious amendments. I thank the professor for taking his time to make this course as I think it can help both people new to US politics and people with preexisting knowledge of US politics. The last lecture on health care was particularly insightful! I didn't even think how it interstate commerce could be invoked to justify the individual mandate. Good stuff.
Coursera Footer
