I'm not suggesting that as long as when they push out the update, as long as they provide people with the new terms in service, then everything's fine. Everything is not fine, I'm just saying that's another interaction where we have a chance to think about what informed consent would look like. I don't have a solution to that problem. When I teach contracts, I ask my students, what do you think about someone signing a contract that gives away the rights of their firstborn, and they just didn't read the fine print? And students are grappling with this idea like, but they had the chance to read it, they should have read it. But then, they know from their real lives that nobody reads those things, and they just click Next, Next, Next, Next, Agree, because they want to get out of the store. They want to download the thing, whatever it is. So, I was simply saying in the cases where the product is being updated, there are many instances where as long as the manufacturer and the end user have continued interactions, there are more than just the entry way. The moment that they decide to buy the device to have this discussion about what informed consent would look like. What it should look like is a very hard question, that I'm not answering right now.