Case Study - Understanding Creative Commons (Optional)

Loading...

來自 UNSW Australia (The University of New South Wales) 的課程

在线教学

184 個評分

UNSW Australia (The University of New South Wales)

在线教学

184 個評分

The Learning to Teach Online (LTTO) MOOC is based upon the multi award winning open educational resource of the same name, developed by Simon McIntyre and Karin Watson. We have built upon these resources in this MOOC, supporting them with a course structure that puts them into a supportive framework for you all to help you find and connect with each other to share your own experiences in the Discussion Forums. This course is not intended as a comprehensive manual for online teaching. Rather, it is intended as a starting point to help you develop your understanding of the principles involved; a place where you can get advice about strategies you might try; and a means from which you can begin to build your confidence and capacity to continue the learning journey in your own contexts and practice. On successful completion of the course you should be able to: - Identify the importance and use of a range of online technologies in learning, teaching, and course design in contemporary education - Evaluate different course designs involving digital technologies and online learning activities appropriate for a range of teaching contexts - Demonstrate independent enquiry and reflective practice On successful completion of the the two Assignments, you will should be able to: Achieve all of the above learning outcomes plus: - Develop an evidence-supported argument for selecting particular technologies to support an online component of your own course - Design an online component of your class considering your local context, your curriculum, and the benefits and risks of online technologies - Develop evaluation and engagement strategies to ensure your students are engaged with your online course components and how you plan to evaluate the effectiveness of your online course design.

從本節課中

Online Assessment Strategies + Online Resources

'Module 5: Online Assessment Strategies' discusses the notions of formative and summative assessment in online contexts. We will also explore benefits and considerations that you'll need to keep in mind if you're considering adopting an online assessment strategy in your own teaching, and how using technology can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the assessment process. 'Module 6: Online Resources' discusses the benefits of using open educational resources (OER), and other online resources in your classes. We will also identify issues to be aware of when using resources that you discover, in terms of licensing and Creative Commons. You will be given the chance to explore several examples of online resources via the activities and associated resources for the module. How to evaluate the effectiveness and appropriateness of resources you find online is also explored.

Key Concept - Online Resources4:30

Case Study - Integrating Online Resources into Your Teaching (Optional)6:12

Case Study - Understanding Creative Commons (Optional)8:18

Case Study - Creating eBooks for Distance Education (Optional)3:52

Case Study - Hippocrates. Online Medical Tutorials (Optional)8:47

與講師見面

Associate Professor Simon McIntyre
Associate Dean Education
UNSW Sydney | Art & Design
Dr Negin Mirriahi
Academic Developer, Learning and Teaching Unit (formerly)
Adjunct Lecturer, School of Education

[MUSIC]

>> In this episode we look at Creative Commons licensing.

Creative Commons is an international non-profit organization

that provides free licenses and tools that

copyright owners can use to allow others

to share, reuse, or remix their material, legally.

In this episode, Dr. Tams Leaver, from Curtin University, explains

some of the different types, and combinations of these licenses.

And offers some useful insights into which

might be better suited for academic purposes.

>> Okay, so this is the basic explanation page on the

Creative Commons website which shows the basic licensing conditions that you have.

So, there are four elements that can be used

in Creative Commons license, and there are six possible combinations.

So, that sounds a little bit

complicated, but it's actually very, very straightforward.

So, let's run through how they work.

Your most basic condition is attribution.

And what that means is on an attribution license you might say who is

the original creator of this work, and where can this original work be found.

That is a basic condition of all Creative Commons licenses.

On top of that, you can have a share alike license.

And what a share alike license tells you is that

anything that you create that borrows from these works must

also be licensed in a similar manner, so basically, it

says, you have to keep the chain of sharing going.

You also have a non-commercial element and a

non-commercial element says, you can do what you

like with this, depending on the other clauses,

but you cannot make money off of it.

Now, there has been a huge debate about what that means,

does it mean education, since more

and more education institutions are commercial?

But the general understanding is that that means most

educational purposes are just fine, but explicit commercial use, i.e.,

using it in a music video or in a video or as, as a

commercial photographer, that would be crossing the

line and finally you have no derivative works.

What that means is that you cannot take an element of this, and use it in your work.

The reason that that's there is that

many people might say, for example, musicians might

want to put a free version of one of their songs up on the web.

But, they don't want to 1,000 remixes made.

They just want to share it for free, so people can get a, a, a feel for it.

That's generally how no derivatives works is used.

Now it's important to flag that this doesn't override fair dealing.

Now, even on a no derivative fair works license, obviously, you can

still quote under fair dealing and it's interesting that every Creative Commons

license now has a little disclaimer that says this does not override

fair dealing of the use depending on the jurisdiction that you're talking about.

Now, there are six ways that those elements

can be recombined and we'll just go really

quickly run through the six possibilities and, and

indeed, talk about which one is best for education.

Now, the most basic license is your attribution license, which says,

you say, who created it, and where you can find this work.

This is brilliant for education, because basically, this is

the same as the sort of citation rules that

we've worked with as academics, and it does mean

you can use it in commercial and non commercial senses.

You could post it back on the web, you can just send it to your tutor, whatever

you need to do you can, you can do with a, a attribution license as long as

you give credit, so that's, if you can

aim for a particular license, that's your best one

because it means you don't have a lot to

think about afterwards as long as you clear credit.

Then you've got your attribution share alike which basically

says, okay attribute it say who, who created it.

And anything you create using that work as

an element of it must have a similar license.

So for example, if students used this in a PowerPoint

presentation or in a short film, that short film or

PowerPoint presentation would also have to have an attribution share

alike license on it so it keeps the chain going.

Now that is something of a restriction, so students do

need to think about whether they're comfortable doing that or not.

Attribution no derivatives means that you have to say who

made it, and you can't cut pieces out of it.

So, you have to use it the way it is.

So, you might be able to play it, in it's entirety, to demonstrate a point in

a lecture, but you can't re, resample it, and use it in a mashup, for example.

Then we've got attribution non commercial share alike, which is all

of those preceding ones and you can't make money off it.

And then you have attribution non-commercial no

derivatives, so that's your most restrictive end.

For students, generally, you would encourage them to stick

with the licenses which are attribution, or attribution non

commercial, or attribution share alike if they are comfortable

with the license they are working exactly the same way.

[BLANK_AUDIO]

It is, of course, the case that yes, if you stick something on the web,

someone might misuse it, that's a reality of, of the way the web works today.

The good thing about Creative Commons is that there is a

global dedicated team of people trying to make Credit Commons work.

And there are lot of very, very top lawyers who will come to your aid if

your Credit Commons license is violated and that's

a, a legal protection very few people enjoy.

If someone violates a credit commons license it is usually the

local Credit Commons team that will be your first port of call.

The great thing about Creative Commons is that they have a license generator.

So if you want to go in and

license, you go to creativecommons.org, hit the License button.

And it will brings up a tour,

which basically walks you through the process so,

In this case, it asks me, do I want to allow commercial uses of my work?

I will say yes.

It says, do I want to allow modifications of my work?

So, could someone remix, could someone take an element

of my photograph, and use it in different ways?

I will say yes, but only as long as they share under similar license.

And, what is my jurisdiction?

Now, Australian students should choose Australia,

not generic, not the United States.

Choose the country that you're working in, because that

gives you the, the most iron clad legal protection.

Now, it's not hugely important, because the licenses are comparable.

Every different jurisdiction works in pretty much the same way, but it's better

to just stick with the exact nature of the country that you're in.

Now, once you've done that, you've already chosen which license that you want.

Then, you can tell the license generator what format the work is in.

For example, if I chose audio or video, it

would generate a different sort of license, and it would

tell me how to embed that in the file, where

would you go in the file to put it there.

But let's, for argument's sake, say that I was doing an image, that I

might type in the title of the work, I'll call it Tama's Great Pic one

and then I can, if I want to, insert other information, I'm not going

to in this case because I don't need it, I'll hit Select a license.

And it will tell me the sort of license that

I've selected, and give me both a visual representation of

that and a code that I can cut and paste

into a document, or into the bottom of the screen.

For example, if I'm posting it onto my blog, if I cut and paste

this at the bottom of the screen, not only does it have a link back

to the license, but it embeds metadata, so that when a search engine like Google

looks at that page, it understands this

is a Creative Commons license under this license.

So when check for it under the Creative Commons search

in Google, it knows what it can and can't find.

So, the licensing tool is actually incredibly straightforward.

And the great thing, of course, is when I click

through it still takes me to a human readable license first.

So, it is important to remember that Creative Commons isn't everything.

It doesn't give you all permissions.

It's only as far as normal copyright law goes.

If you don't want anyone to ever misuse it

in anyway then yes, you probably shouldn't have it online.

But if you're willing to take fairly minor risks

then Creative Common's license is actually a really good way.

because if you've already given some permissions

away, people are much less likely to misuse

it because they, usually, will respect the

ethos of sharing that you've already bought into.

[BLANK_AUDIO]

探索我們的目錄

免費加入並獲得個性化推薦、更新和優惠。

Coursera 致力於普及全世界最好的教育，它與全球一流大學和機構合作提供在線課程。

© 2018 Coursera Inc. 保留所有權利。

通過 App Store 下載

通過 Google Play 獲取