Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

艺术与人文
商务
计算机科学
数据科学
信息技术
健康
数学和逻辑
个人发展
物理科学与工程
社会科学
语言学习
學位
證書

瀏覽 Coursera 的全部課程

瀏覽
搜索
企業版
登錄
免費加入

2.5 The early Earth and origin of life - Geology of the Precambrian: The Mantle and Crust - Emily Pope

Loading...

起源：宇宙、太阳系、地球和生命的形成

哥本哈根大学

4.7（398 個評分） | 21K 名學生已註冊

The Origins course tracks the origin of all things – from the Big Bang to the origin of the Solar System and the Earth. The course follows the evolution of life on our planet through deep geological time to present life forms.

查看授課大綱

審閱

4.7（398 個評分）

5 stars
305 ratings
4 stars
78 ratings
3 stars
10 ratings
2 stars
3 ratings
1 star
2 ratings

KK

Oct 16, 2016

What a detailed course with very good examples and knowledgable presenters. I was highly impressed and learned a lot. Very wide in breath of topics. Highly recommended.

HH

Mar 29, 2018

Such a great experience and it was almost like travelling back in time and again reaching to today's earth. Really worth the money and time spent on this !!!!

從本節課中

The early Earth and origin of life

In this module we are going to have a look at our own planet, just after it formed. Emily Pope will introduce you to the most important geological principles and processes that characterize our Earth. This should make it easier for you to understand how we use geology to reconstruct the evolution of our planet and the life forms that inhabit it. With such tools in hand, Emily will take you on a tour back in deep geological time and tell you about the earliest evolution of our planet and the oldest evidence for life on Earth. We will also take you on a trip to Greenland where Minik Rosing will show the rocks in which he found the oldest evidence for life on Earth.

2.1 The early Earth and origin of life - Uniformitarianism and the Basics of How the Earth Works - Emily Pope13:39

2.2 The early Earth and origin of life - Geologic Time and the Origin of Earth - Emily Pope15:41

2.3 The early Earth and origin of life - Finding Evidence for the Origin of Life - Emily Pope19:30

2.4 The early Earth and origin of life - How to Make Life (or at Least a Best Guess) - Emily Pope 15:07

2.5 The early Earth and origin of life - Geology of the Precambrian: The Mantle and Crust - Emily Pope15:55

2.6 The early Earth and origin of life - Geology of the Precambrian: The Hydrosphere and Atmosphere - Emily Pope17:39

教學方

Henning Haack
Associate Professor
James Connelly
Professor
Vivi Vajda
Professor
Jon Fjeldså
Professor, Curator
Thomas Gilbert
Professor
Michael Houmark-Nielsen
Associate Professor
Bent Erik Kramer Lindow
Curator
Gilles Guy Roger Cuny
Associate Professor
Ole Seberg
Associate Professor
Gitte Petersen
Associate Professor
Tais Wittchen Dahl
Assistant Professor of Geobiology
Arne Thorshøj Nielsen
Associate Professor
Martin Vinther Sørensen
Associate Professor, Curator
Svend Stouge
Associate Professor
Danny Eibye Jacobsen
Associate Professor, Curator
Jan Audun Rasmussen
Associate Professor
Emily Catherine Pope
Assistant professor

腳本

[MUSIC]

One key observation that comes from trying to make life and

trying to identify conditions where life might originate is that the viability of

a biosphere on Earth is wholly dependent on the environment,

essentially on the composition and the physical characteristics of Earth.

What is incredibly intriguing is that as far as we can tell,

Earth has been habitable for at least the last 3.8 billion years,

in spite of incredible changes in the energetic and

geologic forces that determine the conditions of surface environments.

In the final two lessons this week, we will look at evolution of the Earth from

core to mantle to crust, to hydrosphere and atmosphere, with the aim of

giving you a foundation for understanding the Earth's system as a whole,

before you delve forward in discovering the next major emergences along our

own evolutionary path.

To do this, let's consider what drives Earth's evolution.

All the geological processes are the physical or

chemical response of Earth to internal and external energetic forces.

The internal sources of energy being the primordial and

radiogenic heat in the Earth's core and

mantle, and the external source being primarily the heat radiating from the sun.

In this episode, we'll consider the internal energetic forces.

We'll address the external in the next episode.

Internal heat in the Earth is derived from two sources.

Primordial heat obtained during the amalgamation of the Earth due to

the energy released during impact of protoplanets to form the final product.

And radiogenic heat which is produced by the decay of radioactive nuclides into

their daughter products.

Since the moon forming impact, the Earth has been steadily cooling,

there was a finite amount of energy produced during the origin of Earth.

And there are finite number of radioactive nuclides inside the Earth,

steadily decaying to their daughter products, so

that the Earth is producing less heat over time.

The Earth is following the second law of thermodynamics,

it is cooling down because it is approaching thermal equilibrium.

That is, heat radiates from the very hot core to the relatively cool surface and

then escapes to space, and it will continue to do so, until the whole

planet is a uniform temperature, just as a hot glass of water dissipates its heat and

cools to room temperature after sitting there for a while.

The questions that we need to address are, how much has Earth cooled?

Or how hot was it at the beginning of geologic time?

And how has it cooled?

Or what is the mechanism that facilitates Earth's approach towards

thermal equilibrium?

Now the first step to answering these questions is to look at how the Earth

is now, and how, or excuse me, how hot the Earth is now, and how it cools now.

Modern Earth is compositionally structured.

It has a very thin layer of crust, surrounded by a liquid hydrosphere and

a gaseous atmosphere and

inhabited by a biosphere, all the living things, including us.

All that material, crust, hydrosphere and biosphere and

atmosphere to ozone represents only about 2% of the thickness of the Earth.

The rest is comprised of the mantle, composed of dense magnesium and

iron-rich rocks, and the even denser metal core,

which makes up the innermost layer of the Earth.

The core is partly molten.

Its outer layer is liquid, and

the turbulence of this layer is what gives Earth its magnetic field.

Now in order for

that material that makes up the core, which is almost entirely iron, to be

liquid at the extremely high pressures in the center of the Earth, temperatures at

the core have to be between about 5,000 to 6,000 degrees Celsius.

In contrast, the Earth's surface, on average, is about 14 degrees Celsius.

So in its attempt to reach thermal equilibrium, heat has to radiate from

the core and become effectively carried through the mantle, and

that happens through a process called convection.

The mantle solidified within about a hundred million years after the moon

forming impact.

But temperatures are so high still in the mantle that it

actually even though it's solid, it can deform plastically.

Now conceptually, the behavior of the mantle is similar to that of a chocolate

bar in a warm room.

It can bend and deform, because heat makes it soft even though it is still a solid.

The mantle convects, or

flows, by hot and buoyant material at the bottom of the mantle rising.

Colder, denser material, material from near the surface of the mantle sinks

downward, taking its place and then slowly warms up and rises again.

This is how heat gets from the core to the top of the mantle.

The way that heat gets from the top of the mantle out to the Earth's surface and

finally released to space is via a process called plate tectonics.

Now, you've probably heard this term before.

It's a theory that describes how modern Earth works on a larger scale.

How heat and matter are cycled between Earth's surface and its interior.

And it is driven by a mantle convection.

Briefly, plate tectonics theorizes the Earth's outermost layer,

about the upper most 100 to 150 kilometers collectively described as the lithosphere,

is a semi-rigid shell that is divided into discreet pieces or plates.

These plates move around the surface of the Earth relative to one another,

floating on the convecting part of the mantle, which is called the asthenosphere.

Now as hot material rises upward from within the mantle to the surface,

it melts, forming a magma that rises into the crust and

erupts along plate boundaries in the oceans, which are called spreading ridges.

The magma crystallizes to form new basaltic ocean crust,

which makes up the top part of the ridges' lithosphere.

The oceanic lithosphere then spreads laterally away from the ridge,

creating space for new rising magma.

As it spreads away from the hot ridge, the lithosphere thickens and cools, becoming

denser with age until it is actually more dense than the mantle supporting it.

And as it spreads away from the ridge, it is also drifting towards another plate,

which it meets at a convergent plate margin.

Now the oceanic plate is the denser of the two plates.

It sinks back into the mantle, or it subducts, carrying cold material down to

the deep mantle to be warmed up again and continue the mantle convection cycle.

Now when an oceanic lithosphere subducts,

it's not the same rock that crystallized at the spreading ridge.

It has since been hydrothermally altered by sea water due to

water circulation near the mid-ocean ridge.

And it's been weathered to clays due to low temperature,

seawater rock interactions away from the spreading ridge.

And it has been capped by layers of sediments that have precipitated from

seawater or have been deposited by river runoff.

So when this weathered, water ridge ocean lithosphere subducts,

it is actually heated up by the surrounding asthenospheric mantle,

and it begins to degrade, releasing volatiles into the overlying mantle.

Volatiles, especially water,

have the effect of decreasing the melting temperature of the mantle,

by making it easier to dissolve the bonds between atoms in a solid structure.

And so the release of this material from the subducting slam causes the mantle

above to partially melt.

That melt rises though the crust of the overriding plate as magma, and

it forms a volcanic arc.

Now, while the earliest products in such a volcanic arc are usually basaltic,

as ocean crust continues to subduct, newly formed melts from the mantle rise through

the arc and partially melt the pre-existing basalt, forming new,

more silica-rich volcanic rocks.

If subduction occurs beneath existing continental crust,

the rising mantle-derived magma will partially melt

the surrounding continental crust, forming silicic volcanic products like granite.

As a result, just as ocean crust is made predominantly of a thin and

dense layer of basalt, continental crust is composed of granitic type rocks,

much more buoyant and forming a much thicker crust.

Plate tectonics satisfactorily describes what drives nearly

all phenomena we observe on Earth today.

Thick mountain ranges like the Himalayas are formed when two plates of

continental crust collide, and neither can subduct.

They just stack up onto each other.

Most volcanoes form from devolatilization of the downgoing slab in

a subduction zone environment.

They form island chains of volcanoes when subducting under ocean crust,

like in Japan.

Or they form mountains of volcanic chains like the Andes when

they subduct under continental crust.

Earthquakes are the physical response to tectonic plates sliding

against one another.

Locations where the largest earthquakes occur are along boundaries between

plates where lithosphere is sliding past, over or under one another.

We can actually measure the direction and the speed at which the plates are moving.

And we can use paleomagnetic data to calculate where the plates have been, so that we

can track the plates as oceans grow and push continents together into one giant,

super continent and then break it apart again.

So now that we know how the layers of the Earth work together,

let's go back to our original questions.

How hot was the mantle, and

has it always released the same amount of heat to the surface as it does today?

Has it always cooled in the same way, by plate tectonics?

Models for how average mantle temperatures have

changed over Earth history can only work backwards from the modern parameters.

They estimate the modern rates of heat flow out of the mantle and

the modern rates of heat being produced in the mantle by radioactive decay,

and then they calculate backwards.

And variations in these models are a result of uncertainty of

the efficiency and the continuity of mantle heat loss via plate tectonics and

on uncertainty about the amount of radioactive nuclides in the mantle.

Now in the case of the first variable, if heat flow is greater than heat production,

the mantle cools.

On modern Earth, heat flow is limited by the efficiency of

plate tectonics to conduct heat from the top of the mantle to the Earth's surface.

So heat flow should be comparable to today's for

as long as plate tectonics operated the same way as it does now.

But what evidence do we have for how plate tectonics operated in the past?

Or if it even existed?

Well, the most clear cut evidence of

plate tectonic processes are the rock products that made at tectonic margins.

Slices of oceanic crust that are formed at mid-ocean ridges and

subsequently smooshed up or accreted onto continents and exposed.

Or metamorphic rocks called blueschists and

and eclogites that are formed only in subduction zone settings where

pressures are very high, and temperatures are low in the cold subducting slab.

The oldest unequivocal examples of these rocks about 1 billion years ago.

But that doesn't necessarily mean plate tectonics didn't exist before then,

it is possible that such rocks simply weren't preserved.

They have since eroded away or were recycled back into the mantle.

Alternatively, the mantle might have been hot enough that

while plate tectonics did operate, the dynamics of it were slightly different.

And the mantle may have melted at higher temperatures, forming rocks with

different chemistries than today, so ending with different products.

Some models suggest that if the mantle were significantly hotter in

the Hadean and early Archean, then plate tectonics wouldn't work.

A much hotter mantle might melt more extensively, producing very thick,

oceanic crust.

More than 30 kilometers,

as compared to the seven kilometer-thick ocean crust produced today.

Additionally, the oceanic lithosphere, which is composed of

both the ocean crust and the uppermost mantle, might not even cool down enough to

provide the significant density difference that drives modern subduction.

If this is the case, some hypothesize an alternative form of heat release from

the mantle called vertical tectonics, on which hot magma rises to the Earth's

surface primarily in the form of large mantle plumes.

Somewhere the plumes that form the Hawaiian islands, for

example, and cooler roots of over thick and crust back down into the mantle.

The question of when plate tectonics, as we know it today,

started remains unresolved.

Well, there aren't any type features like complete sections of ocean crust or

blueschists or eclogites older than a billion years.

Several suites of Precambrian rock, including the one you

learned about earlier, the 3.8 billion-year-old Isua Supracrustal Belt,

have many characteristics consistent with plate tectonics.

More recently, small fragments of the kind of mantle rock that forms in

subduction zones were found as inclusions in 3.2 billion-year-old diamonds,

again suggesting plate tectonics might be a very old process.

Let's now consider the other uncertainty.

The concentration of radioactive nuclides in the mantle and

their influence on heat production over Earth history.

Because radiogenic elements decay,

the total quantity of radioactive nuclides in the bulk Earth has decreased over time.

But the mantle may have lost its radiogenic heat source proportionately

faster than expected from simple element decay rates.

Because most significant radioactive elements for heat production, that is 238

Uranium, 235 Uranium, 232 Thorium and 40 Potassium are all incompatible elements.

They'd rather be in continental crust than in mantle rock.

So if all the continental crust grew in the first 100 million years after

the formation of the Earth, there would be less radioactive isotopes to

heat the mantle than if continental crust has grown gradually over Earth's history.

Well, so how do we know which of these happened?

Well, this is another major discussion in geology.

The 4.4 billion-year-old Jack Hill zircons indicate that granite existed in

the early Hadean, and therefore, there must have been some continental crust,

almost immediately at the beginning of Earth history.

But the evidence of how much, and the timing of, and the rates at

which continents have grown since then, since the early Hadean, remains ambiguous.

Now early theories that continental crust has grown gradually over Earth

history were inspired by the relative age distribution of continental crust on

Earth today.

If continental crust doesn't subduct, its growth is cumulative, and

the age distribution reflects the volume distribution over time.

Now this concept has since been rejected as too simplistic a view of

continental growth.

It does not account for metamorphic resetting of radiogenic rock ages,

it doesn't account for recycling of crustal material into younger rocks, or

even recycling back into the mantle, which does happen on a small scale in

the form of clastic sediments depositing on ocean crust and

then being dragged down into the mantle as the crust subducts.

In fact, it is actually entirely plausible that you could get

the modern distribution of rock ages, either by gradual and

continuous growth of the continents or by growing all the continents at once and

then steadily recycling old crusts at the same rate that you make new crusts.

And geologists are constantly seeking new geochemical or

geophysical proxies to elucidate which of these growth curves is the correct one.

And in general, the idea seems to most, or the data seems to

most fully support a middle road, gradual and continuous continental growth, but

such that it was actually faster in the Archean and Hadean and

then stabilized to a slower rate of growth around 3 billion years ago.

Around the same time more relatively substantial evidence for

plate tectonics is observed.

In summary, the estimates we now have on the timing of plate tectonics and

continental growth are shaping how we think about mantle evolution.

There's a lot more to be done before any of these variables are really

constrained for the Precambrian Era.

It's important that we keep trying to figure it out though.

Not only to understand how the temperature of Earth's interior has evolved over time

but also to sort out how the temperature of Earth's surface has evolved.

And that is what we will discuss in the next episode.

[MUSIC]

探索我們的目錄

免費加入並獲得個性化推薦、更新和優惠。

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. 保留所有權利。

通過 App Store 下載

通過 Google Play 獲取

Coursera
關於
管理團隊
工作機會
目錄
證書
MasterTrack™ 證書
學位
企業版
政府版

社區
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

連接
博客
Facebook
領英
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
技術博客

更多
條款
隱私
幫助
內容訪問
媒體
聯繫我們
目錄
附屬公司