An actionable leadership improvement plan enables you to leverage strengths and close the gaps on weaknesses. In this course, you will build your own plan that you can put into practice immediately and realize goals within the next two years. It lays the foundation for an evergreen process of selection and prioritization of skills, and action planning for sustained leadership development.
Model of Group Development
Loading...
來自 Rice University 的課程
Personal Leadership Development Planning and Leading High Performing Teams
26 個評分
瀏覽相關視頻
您將在 Coursera 發現全球最優質的課程。以下是為我們為您提供的部分個性化建議
從本節課中
Module 3 - Launching Creative Project Teams
與講師見面
David Van KleeckProfessor in the Practice of Engineering Leadership
Rice Center for Engineering Leadership
Before we explore how to launch teams,
it's useful to take some time to examine how teams actually evolve over time.
We're going to call this our model of group development.
This model is originally proposed by Tuckman in 1965 and
consisted of four stages of forming, storming, norming and performing stage.
In our text, the Whetten and Cameron textbook, that we're using for
this course,
they've slightly altered that order to put to reverse storming and norming.
There are good reasons for
doing this based on their observations of how groups actually evolve.
I don't think it's especially important which order they're in as long
as we understand which stage we're in and what the characteristics are.
In the context of engineering teams, I've added a fifth stage
that is representative of how temporary teams might be formed and
conduct their work as they execute projects.
And we call this the adjourning stage.
This is used where teams have a finite lifetime and are not permanent teams.
Let's begin then with the forming stage.
When groups of people are initially brought together, for
the most part they're polite,
they're cordial, but they may not know the other members of the team.
This is particularly true when you bring multi-disciplinary teams together
from different parts of the organization.
In this environment, typically as the new participants are getting involved
in the project they're high on enthusiasm, but they're a little bit
low on trust because they don't know the other members of the team.
Getting a team productive at this stage can be a little bit difficult because
of the lack of established relationships.
One of the primary concerns of the team in the forming stage is to start building
that understanding one team member for another so that they can build trust and
ultimately move towards an interdependent way of operating.
In this stage,
the team should be looking at establishing what its group norms will be.
Frequently, it's best to do this in the form of the team charter or
terms of reference, whatever phrase you use to describe
the document that organizes the team and sets expectations and roles.
But part of that forming stage should include a description of behaviors that
are acceptable and not acceptable in the group, establishing
work processes that will be helpful in delivering work, and
in particular those processes that the team might want to use and consider using
and in times when they experience conflict or encounter obstacles to their work.
The amount of time that team takes in this forming stage,
we're going to talk about in a little bit more detail later but
it's not unusual for this to take between 20 and 40% of
the lifetime of the group that it might take in this forming stage.
Moving out of that forming stage as quickly as possible to the next
stage is going to be important for overall success.
In the Whetten and
Cameron model, this next stage is what we call the norming stage.
In this stage the participants in the team have adjusted to their roles.
They have a better, deeper understanding of what their roles and
expectations are in the team, and the team is actually delivering some work product.
Here the team members have gotten to know each other a little bit, they're building
trust and they're demonstrating mutual concern for each other.
However, they still are not at that high performing level that we would like
to reach in later stages of the development.
In the original Tuckman model, this stage was replaced by storming
In that storming stage, team members experience conflict.
Conflict can arise over a variety of issues that we talked about
previously in the relationship management course.
Could be role definitions, expectations, alignment of the goals.
There are a variety of things that might cause conflict among the team members.
Here you may actually see collisions forming with in the team.
Sides being taken and it's extremely important in this stage that
the team have a mechanism in place to deal with that conflict effectively.
Using all of the tools that we've describe previously
in the relationship management course.
But incorporating some of those procedures formally into the team
charter can be extremely useful when the team begins to encounter conflict.
Conflict is going to be inevitable.
Every team at some point or other will experience some form of conflict.
So it's It's not necessarily a problem as long as the team doesn't get stuck
in that position and can effectively deal with it when it does come up.
Well, moving to the performing stage is highly desirable.
Not all teams get there.
And I think you should recognize that there maybe many teams in which you
participate where you're at the norming or storming stage and
cycle between those over time without ever getting to the performing stage.
It takes unique blend of followers and leaders along with alignment
of goals to make sure that a team moves to that performing stage.
In engineering teams frequently the team has a limited lifetime.
It's only going to exist for the duration of the project,
whether that's a few months to maybe a few years.
There ultimately comes an end to the project team.
I would suggest to you that it is helpful for all of the members of the team to
recognize that there is an adjourning stage.
There's a formal close.
This is the opportunity to celebrate victory when the team is successful and
to recognize those participants in the team appropriately.
Closing out a team effectively sets the stage for
each individual's participation in other teams later on.
I think it's useful to recognize also
that there are internal recycle loops in this development process.
Teams that get to that storming stage,
once they've resolved the conflict may revert back to a norming stage.
This would be expected.
And that may be necessary before that team can move from the norming
to the higher performing stage.
It is also possible for the norming team to move to that higher performing level.
So recognize that there are multiple ways to get to that high performing level, but
almost always will involve a norming and storming stage in between.
It's also useful to recognize that changes in the team composition
can have an impact on these stages of team development.
You should recognize that whenever you change the membership in a team,
that introduces enough difference that
a team may have to devote some time to reestablishing the group norms.
Integrating the new person into the way that particular team works and recognizing
that you may experience regression in terms of the stages of team development.
Significant changes in the team frequently will cause conflict.
Once the team resolves those it can resume the pathway towards norming and
ultimately to a high performing team.
Understanding these stages of team development
will help you recognize where you are and what leadership style
you may choose to use to help guide these teams to deliver their work products.
