So, in parallel with editing the text, write the resubmission introduction.
In this introduction, you will list criticisms together with your responses.
And this section is a guide for the reviewer.
As this way, it will be clear for him or her, what exactly was questioned.
And how the principal investigator reacted to the criticisms.
And what additions and alterations were made.
When you compile the final version of the resubmission introduction.
Start with the appreciation to the reviewers, and
compliments you received from them.
For example, you write.
We thank the reviewers for
recognizing our research is a study that may generate knowledge on pyrethroid
resistance that will help important implications on vector control programs.
Our research team is outstanding.
And our proposed methods are appropriate.
We respond here to the issues raised in the summary statement and
by specific reviewers.
Afterwards, you'll list remarks and your responses.
For instance, this way.
You identify the reviewer, a group of reviewers.
Such as The summary and reviewer one.
Then you write the criticism in quotation marks.
For example, the research scope is too large.
And then you answer it.