Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

艺术与人文
商务
计算机科学
数据科学
信息技术
健康
数学和逻辑
个人发展
物理科学与工程
社会科学
语言学习
學位
證書

瀏覽 Coursera 的全部課程

瀏覽
搜索
企業版
登錄
免費加入

Module 28: Performing MVPA II

Loading...

fMRI 基础 2

约翰霍普金斯大学

4.7（114 個評分） | 7.7K 名學生已註冊

This course covers the analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data. It is a continuation of the course “Principles of fMRI, Part 1”

查看授課大綱

審閱

4.7（114 個評分）

5 stars
86 ratings
4 stars
23 ratings
3 stars
4 ratings
2 stars
1 ratings

JM

May 24, 2019

Very good course. Best week is the last week. Its does a good overview of fMRI Statistical analysis and design of experiments.

PA

Sep 29, 2016

Thanks a lot, both curses were very interesting and will help a lot in future research!

從本節課中

Week 4

This week we will focus on multi-voxel pattern analysis.

Module 25: Multi-voxel Pattern Analysis: A neuroscientific perspective10:42

Module 25B: Multi-voxel Pattern Analysis: A neuroscientific perspective7:06

Module 26: MVPA Intro10:17

Module 27: Performing MVPA I9:51

Module 28: Performing MVPA II5:10

Module 29: MVPA-PM Example – NPS - Expand: Social and physical pain10:35

Module 29B: MVPA-PM Example – NPS - Expand: Social and physical pain7:17

教學方

Martin Lindquist, PhD, MSc
Professor, Biostatistics
Tor Wager
PhD

腳本

Hi, in the previous module we started talking about the basic steps that you

need to do in order to perform an MVPA analysis.

In this module we'll continue.

So recall that the process of performing an MVPA analysis

follows a series of steps.

The first is defining features and classes.

The second is feature selection.

The third is choosing a classifier.

The fourth is training and testing the classifier.

And the final step is examining the results.

So we talked about the first three steps in the last module and

this time we'll talk about the final two steps.

So to accurately asses the performance of a classifier when applied to a new data

set, it's critical to use separate data to train and test the classifier.

Ideally, we'd like to train a classifier using as much of the available data as

possible.

However, this is going to leave very little to test with.

One approach to balance this problem is to use cross validation.

So k-fold cross-validation is performed in the following manner.

We first divide the data set into K different parts, or folds.

We then leave one fold out, and then train on the remaining K-1 folds.

We predict the observation on the omitted fold, and we repeat for each fold in turn.

So using cross-validation approaches,

each part of the data is is is at some time in the test data set.

And multiple times in the training data set.

And then finally, we compute accuracy of all the predictions made.

If unbiased accuracy assessment is important,

then we tend to want to use more folds.

because there's less error using large training data.

If on the other hand,

parameter optimization is important, then we tend to use fewer folds.

We get a more stable estimate of the area using large test data.

In practice, 5 or 10 folds is often used as a compromise.

When performing cross-validation,

it's important that each fold contains observations from each class.

For example, if we're doing a classification of faces versus houses,

you want each fold to contain examples of both faces and houses.

The classes should be roughly balanced in the cross-validation procedure.

And stratification can be used to guarantee that each class is adequately

represented.

I want you however to be careful to include correlated observations in

the same fold because otherwise you may bias your test data set.

Cross-validation provides a method for choosing between different

types of classifiers and determining certain parameter estimates.

Final classifier weights can be obtained in a number of ways,

such as averaging weights across folds.

We often want to determine the accuracy of a classifier to determine whether it

works better than chance.

A simple approach is just to use simple binomial test with

p(success)=0.05 per trial.

In the case that we have two different observations.

So, if our classifier doesn't do better than a coin flip

in separating houses versus faces, then it's really of no use to us.

A more accurate way to quantify performance is to use resampling methods.

It's important to examine the accuracy for all classes of observations,

rather than computing the overall accuracy across observations.

If almost all of the observations fall in the same class, then assigning

all new observations to that class will tend to give a high overall accuracy.

For example, if 90% of all observations fall in class A then a classifier that

always assigns new observations to this class will have a 90% overall accuracy.

It will also have a 100% accuracy of correctly classifying class

A observations.

However, it will have 0% accuracy of correctly identifying class B

observations because the classifier always tells you be in class A.

So this is not so good.

An important question is determining which voxels drive the classification.

And so the classifier weights can be mapped back onto the brain to provide

information about each voxels contribution to the classifier performance.

So, different classifiers may provide different maps

as they're sensitive to different features in the data.

So, in this particular example, we might have the w here, which are the classifier

weights, which again, let's just say for sake of argument that it's a vector

of length v, where v corresponds to all the voxels of the brain.

We can then map this back on to the brain to see

the relative contribution of each voxel.

And we can use this for interpretation purposes.

In fMRI it is important to make analysis choices that

balance interpretability with predictive power.

Certain methods may give good predictions but the resulting voxel weights

maybe difficult to interpret and may not generalize to new subjects.

So we always want to balance those things to have a classifier that has a good

accuracy with one that tells us something about the underlying neural science.

Okay, so that's the end of this module and

this was the second module on how to perform an MBPA analysis.

Okay, thank you, bye.

探索我們的目錄

免費加入並獲得個性化推薦、更新和優惠。

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. 保留所有權利。

通過 App Store 下載

通過 Google Play 獲取

Coursera
關於
管理團隊
工作機會
目錄
證書
MasterTrack™ 證書
學位
企業版
政府版

社區
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

連接
博客
Facebook
領英
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
技術博客

更多
條款
隱私
幫助
內容訪問
媒體
聯繫我們
目錄
附屬公司