So how to define?
How to define?
I would say first, that globalization implies three symptoms.
And I would like to approach globalization through these three symptoms.
The first one is inclusion for the first time in the world history,
we are all in the same boat, that's to say humanity
is entirely included in the same arena.
It's playing on a unique arena and this is really new,
this is really a new aspect of the world order that we didn't
meet in the president steps of the human history.
And that means if we are in an including world there is no center
that's to say no possibility to conceive a center and
even in Germany on this new global world.
The second symptom of globalization is to be found in mobility.
We are in a world of communication we're in a world of transportation,
we're in a world in which people are more and
more able to move and also to transgress the border lines.
Mobility is a new parameter which is challenging the traditional
order which is made of statism of stability and of territorial stability.
We are no more in the territorial world but in a world of mobility.
And the church of symptom is into dependents.
We are depending on each order,
that means that the weak is still depending on the strong.
But that means something much more important.
That risk globalization now, the strong is also depending on the weak.
This is quite new and that's why I say that the concept of power
is now challenged, and power is getting powerless.
Can you see now world order, how a small state house
a very weak connectivity,
is able to control, to make pressure,
to contain the strengths of the strongest.
