Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

艺术与人文
商务
计算机科学
数据科学
信息技术
健康
数学和逻辑
个人发展
物理科学与工程
社会科学
语言学习
學位
證書

瀏覽 Coursera 的全部課程

瀏覽
搜索
企業版
登錄
免費加入

8.6 A Base for Contemporary Studies

Loading...

古典社会学理论

阿姆斯特丹大学

4.8（1,137 個評分） | 37K 名學生已註冊

This Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) will offer the participants an introduction into the most important classical sociological readings between the 18th and 20th century. Highly influential social science scholars, such as Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim, will be discussed during 8 sessions. Combined with small tests, based on the video’s and recommended readings, the participants will be encouraged to dive deeply into the complex texts and get familiar with classical sociological concepts that are still very relevant today.

查看授課大綱

審閱

4.8（1,137 個評分）

5 stars
980 ratings
4 stars
136 ratings
3 stars
14 ratings
2 stars
4 ratings
1 star
3 ratings

EB

Feb 15, 2018

Great course, absolutely loved the teacher and his passion and how he explains difficult notions with so much ease. I would definitely recommend this course, it is a great first look into sociology.

KK

Aug 27, 2017

i began this class to review more of de Tocqueville and still have not had time to do so; however, i still prefer TocQ to all of these other thinkers. Wonderful experience... thank so much!!! <3

從本節課中

Session 8: Norbert Elias (1897-1990)

Elias is the last of the Classical Sociologists. Elias' theory focusses on long term trends, with his so called process or figurational sociology. He shows us how the civilisation proces can be explained in terms like Self-Constraint and Figurations.

8.1 The Last of the Great Classic Sociologists5:43

8.2 Introduction to the Civilizing Process6:55

8.3 The Social Constraint Towards Self-Constraint8:26

8.4 The Conditions of Civilisation6:48

8.5 The Importance of Norbert Elias6:13

8.6 A Base for Contemporary Studies7:09

8.7 Figurational Processes6:14

8.8 Classical Sociological Theories: a Focus on Long Term Trends6:11

教學方

Bart van Heerikhuizen
Dr.

腳本

But something else did happen.

Many sociologists, anthropologists and

historians have used Elias' theory of the civilizing process.

As their point of departure for their own empirical and theoretical studies.

Let me give you a few examples of studies that could have been done,

and a few studies that actually have been done.

Elias takes as his example,

as you know now, the civilizing process in Europe between, well, let's say,

the late Middle Ages and the period around the French Revolution.

But one could do a similar study, focusing on

ancient Egypt or ancient Greece or ancient Rome.

Elias was personally very interested in African culture, but

his book focuses on Western Europe.

Why not study civilizing processes among the Mayans or among the Aztecs?

Why not write a study about civilizing processes in Japan?

When we were students of Elias in Amsterdam, we always wanted to know what

that professor thought of contemporary developments.

Did he have any ideas about the sexual revolution,

that we found ourselves in the middle of?

Didn't he think that the process in which the naked body had to be hidden,

was now something of the past?

Elias was always amused and intrigued by our questions.

And he didn't shy away from discussing them with us.

But he was reluctant in giving answers.

He said it's a bit too early to make judgments here.

Maybe in a few centuries time, sociologists will be able to say

what the so-called sexual revolution really meant.

But when we were enthusiastically talking about the nude beach, for

example, as an empirical case that seemed to show to us,

that a civilizing process had come to a standstill, maybe even those reversed.

Then, our professor was not at all convinced, the people on those new

beaches had a lot of impulses to control, he said.

They allowed themselves and

each other, to let go of some of the traditional behavioral controls.

But this process of decontrolling those controls,

was actually a very controlled process.

Those discussions about the applicability of the theory in contemporary society,

have lead to all kinds of sociological studies.

Let me mention one author, the Dutch sociologist Calsvalters,

who has made those questions the subject matter of his PhD.

And later many new books followed, written by Calsvalters,

some of which are translated into the English language.

And then of course, there is that hard question about the implications of

the civilizing process for the power balances, between social groups.

An interesting subject, is how the higher classes in society in the 20th century,

tried to civilize how to say, the lower classes.

Elias said, you may remember that, that in the period that he studied the process of

civilization, was not organized unplanned, not steered by anyone in particular.

But the Amsterrdam sociologist, Allie Derecht demonstrated in her Ph.D.,

that in the 20th century a kind of civilizing offensive was organized,

to force lower class people to adopt certain behavioral standards.

For example, regarding the hygiene of their houses,

the organization of their kitchens.

But the civilising process also had an influence on the power balance,

between men and women.

And also, very important, on the power balance between older people, and

younger people.

For example, the balance between parents and their children, or

between teachers and their pupils.

Of course, it is very interesting subject for research.

Even the long-term changes,

in the way in which people in the West have been treating non-human animals.

It's a topic that can be studied with the help of hypothesis,

that are derived from elyesis theory, and

finally there is the very dark subject of relationship

between processes of civilization, or decivilization.

And the occurrence of state violence, and even the persecution of minorities.

Sometimes I meet people who say, that it's such a strange confidence that

Elias was writing his magnum opus on civilization.

When on the other side of the North Sea, the National Socialists in Germany,

were planning the extermination of the Jews.

But I have the feeling that there is no coincidence here,

Elias writing in the second half of the 30s, as a refugee in London.

Wanted to understand civilization, and the conditions under which it may break down.

He studied the forces that produce civilizing processes, and

implicitly also the forces that might lead to de-civilization.

And in a way, I find his book not so very reassuring.

How ever pacified we may have become,

the pleasure in killing people is never far away.

I think that Elias thought of what was going on in his home country,

when he wrote the following sentence.

>> And immerse social upheaval and urgency, heightened by

carefully concerted propaganda, are needed to reawaken, and

legitimize in large masses of the people >> The socially

outlawed drives, the joy in killing, and destruction

that have been repressed from everyday civilized life.

探索我們的目錄

免費加入並獲得個性化推薦、更新和優惠。

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. 保留所有權利。

通過 App Store 下載

通過 Google Play 獲取

Coursera
關於
管理團隊
工作機會
目錄
證書
MasterTrack™ 證書
學位
企業版
政府版

社區
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

連接
博客
Facebook
領英
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
技術博客

更多
條款
隱私
幫助
內容訪問
媒體
聯繫我們
目錄
附屬公司