What is philosophy? How does it differ from science, religion, and other modes of human discourse? This course traces the origins of philosophy in the Western tradition in the thinkers of Ancient Greece. We begin with the Presocratic natural philosophers who were active in Ionia in the 6th century BCE and are also credited with being the first scientists. Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximines made bold proposals about the ultimate constituents of reality, while Heraclitus insisted that there is an underlying order to the changing world. Parmenides of Elea formulated a powerful objection to all these proposals, while later Greek theorists (such as Anaxagoras and the atomist Democritus) attempted to answer that objection. In fifth-century Athens, Socrates insisted on the importance of the fundamental ethical question—“How shall I live?”—and his pupil, Plato, and Plato’s pupil, Aristotle, developed elaborate philosophical systems to explain the nature of reality, knowledge, and human happiness. After the death of Aristotle, in the Hellenistic period, Epicureans and Stoics developed and transformed that earlier tradition. We will study the major doctrines of all these thinkers. Part I will cover Plato and his predecessors. Part II will cover Aristotle and his successors.
The Goal of Life
Loading...
來自 University of Pennsylvania 的課程
Ancient Philosophy: Aristotle and His Successors
383 個評分
從本節課中
Aristotle's Ethics
The motion of the universe is eternal and its cause is an eternal unmoved mover, Aristotle’s god. Our goal in life is to achieve happiness, which comes in two varieties: the human happiness we achieve by exercising the virtues of character, and the godlike happiness we achieve when we grasp eternal truths.
與講師見面
Susan Sauvé MeyerProfessor
Department of Philosophy
[MUSIC]
The goal of life.
Now we turn to Aristotle's ethical philosophy, which has come down to us in
two different treatises known as the Eudemian Ethics and Nicomachean Ethics.
Our focus will be on the Nicomachean Ethics,
which is likely the later of the two works.
It is standardly referred to by the abbreviation
of its Latin title, EN, for Ethica Nicomachea.
Now, the basic question addressed by ethics in the ancient
tradition is a very broad one.
How should we live?
That is, how should we conduct our lives?
We've seen that this is how Socrates formulates what he calls the most
important question in his address to the jurors in the Apology and
in his arguments with Thrasymachus in the Republic.
There the question is, what is the life of the unjust person like?
And how does it compare to the life of the just person?
Which is the better life to live?
Aristotle thinks that the way to address this basic ethical question is
by asking a more precise question.
What is the goal of life?
For at least a thousand years after Aristotle,
this became the central question of ethics known as the telos question,
since telos is the Greek for goal.
Different ethical schools were distinguished by the answers they gave
to the telos questions.
And we will soon consider Aristotle's own answer.
But before we can appreciate his answer to the telos question,
we need to make sure we understand the question.
Now by the goal of life he means some end, some telos,
of everything that is pursued in action.
Sometimes he calls this the highest good, or the human good.
We shouldn't be surprised that he alternates between calling it the end and
the good, since in the Physics, where he identifies
the final cause as one of the four causes, he calls it the end and the good.
In the Physics, we saw that Aristotle insists on the controversial thesis
that there are goals or ends in nature.
But here in the Ethics, we are on less disputed terrain for the final cause,
for it is uncontroversial that human beings engage in goal-directed behavior.
Indeed, this is a pervasive feature of human activity,
as Aristotle remarks in the opening lines of the Nicomachean Ethics.
Every craft, he says, and every investigation, and
likewise every action and decision seems to aim at some good.
That good is the point or the goal of that activity.
For example, I boil water every morning.
Why?
In order to make coffee.
The coffee is my goal.
I go for a walk in the afternoon.
Why?
In order to be healthy.
Here you are watching a lecture on Aristotle.
Why?
Because you want to learn about ancient philosophy, or
because you want to get your degree, maybe for both reasons.
Can you think of anything that you don't do for a reason?
Perhaps biting your nails or squinting in the sun, or other automatic responses.
But these fall below or on the borderline of agency.
They're more like digestion and respiration than things we do.
But when we are acting or doing, not merely idling,
just about everything we do has a point or a goal, or so Aristotle claims.
Now you might think that playing music or playing a sport or
spending time with friends are things you don't do for any particular reason.
You just enjoy doing them.
Well, that's a reason too.
Pleasure or enjoyment is a very familiar goal of action.
But more to the point, Aristotle would claim that even apart from any
pleasure you may get from performing music or playing a sport,
these are instances where the activity itself, the playing, is a goal.
So let's take playing the piano.
It's actually a complex set of bodily motions and perceptual responses.
What's the point of sitting on the piano bench and
moving your fingers all over the place?
I'm playing a sonata.
What's the point of chasing that ball all over the field?
I'm playing soccer.
These are cases where, as Aristotle points out,
the goal we pursue is not a product distinct from the activity,
unlike the coffee I brew or the boat that the shipbuilder makes.
When you sit at the piano to play a nocturne by Chopin,
performing the nocturne is your goal.
The performance is not the product of your activity, something distinct from it, but
it is the point to what you're doing sitting there at the piano.
If you are an avid cyclist, then going for
a long ride on the weekend will be another example of an activity that is a goal.
But if going for a ride or performing music are goals, according to Aristotle,
what are they the goals of?
Well, going for a ride involves pedaling, shifting gears,
signaling, looking at a map, watching the road, and so forth.
The point of all this activity is cycling.
Similarly, playing soccer involves running, turning, kicking, blocking,
and guarding, and the point to all this is playing soccer.
Playing a Chopin nocturne involves all the different things the right hand and
the left hand are doing on the keyboard,
as well as what the foot is doing at various times on the pedals.
All of these activities are coordinated and
unified by their point, which is playing the nocturne.
Indeed, sometimes the easiest way to explain what you are doing in a complex
situation is to cite the goal or the point.
What are you doing?
I'm doing tai chi, or I'm orienteering,
or I'm keeping kosher.
Now, Aristotle thinks what are you doing is a question that can be asked
about your life as a whole.
There are all kinds of things that you're doing in your life, maybe performing
music, playing a sport, raising a family, growing a garden, having a career,
participating in the life of your community, spending time with friends.
But what is the point to all this?
What is it all about?
This is roughly the sort of question Aristotle is asking when he asks
whether there is some end, some telos, of everything that we pursue in action.
