Chevron Left
返回到 Managing an Agile Team

學生對 弗吉尼亚大学 提供的 Managing an Agile Team 的評價和反饋

4.7
574 個評分
120 個審閱

課程概述

While agile has become the de facto standard for managing digital innovation teams, many wonder if they’re doing it ‘right’. Twitter is full of jokes about how teams say they do agile but don’t ‘really’ do it. The reality is that getting the most out of agile is less about observing specific procedures and more about how a team focuses and measures their progress. Rather than just boring you with an accounting of agile methodologies, this course focuses on helping you better charter your team’s focus, definition of success, and practice of agile. While learning about agile mainstays like Scrum, XP, and kanban, you’ll also learn to help your team ask the right questions about how they’re working and facilitate good answers on how agile can help. As a Project Management Institute (PMI®) Registered Education Provider, the University of Virginia Darden School of Business has been approved by PMI to issue 20 professional development units (PDUs) for this course, which focuses on core competencies recognized by PMI. (Provider #2122) This course is supported by the Batten Institute at UVA’s Darden School of Business. The Batten Institute’s mission is to improve the world through entrepreneurship and innovation: www.batteninstitute.org....

熱門審閱

FB

Nov 13, 2018

I have learned new things about agile practices and it worth the time to take the course. Sometimes I had the impression that some subject are vague, but overall the course rised to the expectations

OS

Jun 26, 2017

The course was challenging for me since I lacked the experience of working in an IT/Software Development, but I thought all the practical exercises forced me to develop some practical skills.

篩選依據:

101 - Managing an Agile Team 的 116 個評論(共 116 個)

創建者 Uma B

Jul 24, 2019

Really good content and easy to learn

創建者 Indra G

May 29, 2018

Good coerce content and very nicely explained.

創建者 Johannes R

Dec 01, 2017

Very good course. Speaker is knowledgable, but sometimes using terrible (funny) analogies.

創建者 Jens G

Jul 01, 2016

In depth and practical.

Some more linking to the previous courses could provide better framing of the courses content in the larger scheme. For a more systemic view of how all things are connected in this course and all previous courses I would have to go deep into it all again. As this was my first acquaintance with such a course

創建者 Varun D

Dec 19, 2018

Good overview and examples from real life, the assignments were relevant too

創建者 Amy M

Jan 30, 2017

Great content, but I felt some sections of the assignments were vague, making them more confusing/harder than needed.

創建者 Kewal P

Jun 17, 2017

Great Insights into agile principals

創建者 Frank H

Jun 07, 2017

too much theory

創建者 Lisa G

Apr 29, 2018

I think it could of been more practical

創建者 Anders L

Feb 02, 2017

Some of the SCRUM, XP & Agile Practices can be better explained. I have expected a few more things here.

創建者 Lauren R

Oct 04, 2017

Courses 1 and 3 are so similar, they could easily be combined to be only one course. I would recommend adding either an additional week

創建者 Konstantin K

Aug 28, 2018

Instructor is beating about a bush all the course.

The lectures are verbose and don't contain much substance

創建者 Ulpiano I

Oct 07, 2019

The information is very useful however the format of videos is too long and boring some times, I appreciate the effort to make dynamic however I think you polish the content a little bit more. Thanks for the course.

創建者 Michael F

Jun 06, 2019

seemed more vague than other courses.

創建者 Alicia A

Nov 03, 2016

Great methodology, timing and very good teacher.

創建者 Pradnya P B

Oct 10, 2019

The Assignments are vague and broad, how can we be asked to take any project and design Trello board for it, alteast the instructor can provide a sample project and guide with high level requirements for the project.

Also the content has been unnecessarily elongated with interviews of industry experts , the course size could easily be cut down by half, by removing atleast some of the expert interviews