The course is designed and presented by professor aptly for beginners. I think before reading the Process Mining book it is good to take this course and then read the book later. The quizzes are good.
Good content, very thorough, and I learned a LOT! Took more time than suggested, as I learn by taking notes and reproducing diagrams. But the course structure allowed for frequent pauses to do this.
創建者 Felix G•
some tasks/assignments were a bit cubersome to navigate but overall a great course
創建者 Jesús R S•
Good approach to an interesting topic and extensive practise exercises with tools.
創建者 Tania K•
Great course. A lot of academic knowledge but also covers practical experience
創建者 A M•
Good course. Gives a nice overview over the topic Process Mining
創建者 Chow K M•
More examples to explain calculations would be helpful.
a bit academic in the beginning, but really interesting.
創建者 Dardo G•
Very interesting, practical and full o information.
I think practical tasks in ProM should be included
創建者 Robin G•
Very clear presentation and a lot of examples
創建者 DHAMMA A•
NO COMPLICATIONS IN THIS COURSE
創建者 Hock B S•
Useful information for my work
創建者 Lerata M•
Challenging and fun
創建者 Rob v d L•
創建者 Gabriel E•
創建者 UMAIR P•
創建者 Sofie H•
Sometimes too technical. It would have enjoyed it more if there would have been the possibility to choose which aspects of Process Mining I was interested in. In one of the last lessons, I came to the understanding that I want to apply process mining to spaghetti-structured event data, therefore I had to learn a lot about prediction, recommendation and so on which than turned out to be completely useless for me. I have the same feeling for the petri net, workflow syste, BPMI and so on that are presented; this is only useful for some users while this takes a large part of the study time. It may thus be recommended to organize a more 'practical' PM course for users interested in using Disco and a more technical course for users interested in more advanced analysing techniques.
創建者 Sylvie B•
Significant learnings on content which appears rationale but proved not to be in modules 2 and 4. The concepts of deadlock, soundness, live is not well explained. The time required is significantly more than advertized by Coursera. The quiz are not timed, even though there is a time indication. Some questions on the quiz have multiple correct answers, which are sometimes very subjective and tricky to get right. Lots of mental gymnastics and computation. Sadly, the concept of peer-graded assignment to strive for honors roll does not work well as the number of learners at anytime is very few, if any. The honors assignment on module 4 is very lengthy and regrettably cannot be completed satisfactorily because of software issues.
創建者 alex b•
Some topics are a bit glazed over and others with concepts that are acknowledged to have major shortcomings (e.g. the alpha algorithm) have a heavy focus in the course and exam despite these shortcomings. Frequent notational switches ("we can automatically change this to ___ ") can make some lectures harder to follow as well, if you're not perfectly versed in some of the leveraged notations in this course. OK overall.
創建者 Martin S•
Good introduction to theory of process mining, but most of the techniques are problematic and therefore not practical, and the test questions are tedious as they focus on testing whether you can remember the theory rather than how to apply the theory to real-world problems.
創建者 Niko M•
Very good course. More real life cases and process mining examples would be beneficial.
創建者 Babak N R•
It should be more practical and the screenshots quality needs to be improved
創建者 Daniel C J•
Poco enfocado al soundness
Some difficult issues need to explain in detail and more patiently
創建者 Vicente C•
too much focus on theory i can't apply this to any real data
創建者 Sinkov E•
The whole course was duplicating a book of an author. It reminds listening to an audiobook. The introduction looked very appealing, so I immediately bought it. It is the first course when I can state that it was a complete waste of time and effort. In my opinion, the teaching skills of an author are fairly low. The material is supplied in a linear manner and honestly, after watching lectures almost no information stays. I've tried watching additional videos via youtube and even those unprofessional free videos are more helpful.