Aug 25, 2016
excellent material! It would be nice, however, to mention some reading material, books or articles, for those interested in the details and the theories behind the concepts presented in the course.
Jan 17, 2017
Excellent course, well thought out lectures and problem sets. The programming assignments offer an appropriate amount of guidance that allows the students to work through the material on their own.
創建者 Ramesh S•
Aug 22, 2018
The clustering course covered a lot of topics, and it seemed a bit hurried too. I felt the quizzes could have been better worded to make it less confusing. LDA in particular deserved a better treatment - more could have been done I thought in terms of explaining the mathematics as well as the intuition (relative to MoG). Overall, it was a good course, but the best way to judge this would have been to ask a question like this - "what if people did clustering and retrieval even before they did other modules (regression and classification) - would the faculty have dealt the subject in the same way? ". My guess, is "unlikely" and that kinda explains what was missing !
創建者 Saeed S T•
Sep 08, 2016
Overall a good and useful course, however:
A) They could do a much better job regarding LDA, standard Gibbs sampling, and Bayesian model and inference. Many slides on these 3 topics only contained some text and the instructor tried to "verbally" visualize the related important concepts. Hence not a good use of a video session.
B) Week 1 and the 1st half of Week 6 were redundant.
C) It would be much better to have a 7-week course with more topics and may be with some optional videos on Bayesian model, HMM.
創建者 Adrien S•
Oct 07, 2016
Feels like this course in the specialization was a bit rushed, compared to the first 3 courses. It had 2 modules (first & last) that were more like placeholders and the middle 4 modules went from concept to the maths behind the algorithm very quickly. It needs a bit of work on expanding the course and presenting a bit more slowly. Having said all that, the concepts and algorithms taught are very interesting and a good first step into the unsupervised learning section.
創建者 Oliverio J S J•
Jun 20, 2018
Some of the contents of this course are interesting, but it seems that this course has been very affected by the changes that forced the cancellation of the last two courses of the specialization. Apparently, they had to redo it and there are even two fake weeks (the first one and the last one). It is a pity that they did not want to spend more time to reorganize it.
創建者 Ahmed N•
Jul 18, 2017
The course focus on a great part of researches i have never read about them or had any idea about all of it. It doesn't focus on how we implement the core functions of machine learning but it was all of benefits and very very good to me i have learned a lot of things thank you all it's very tough and challenging course for me thank you all.
創建者 Dmitri B•
Jun 21, 2017
Theory is cool but programming assignments requires proficient phyton knowledge. GraphLab helps but it wont be used in real life in our company :(
I found strange that often optional topics are major part of quiz, but anyway you should watch everything :)
創建者 Dimitrios Z•
Jun 08, 2019
It has intresting theory but I believe the exercises need to be improvised. Maybe using Jupyter online and guiding the student to write code to solve the problems. In conclusion, I understood the basic theory but mostly that.
創建者 Kayvan S•
Feb 15, 2018
Great course but I think the workload could be spread across the weeks more. Also, I had a lot of trouble with the sklearn toolkit (probably due to installation issues.).
創建者 Piotr Ś•
Feb 15, 2017
Dependence on GraphLab technology is a big minus. The lectures are poorly balanced in terms of difficulty. Apart from that - interesting course, I'm glad I took it.
創建者 Aayush G•
Nov 10, 2016
This specific course traded off depth and detail for breadth of topics. Too many ideas were quickly described and not really built up to my liking.
創建者 Pavan B•
Jul 29, 2019
Few concepts were covered in hurry with lot of concepts described abruptly. It took a while for me to do research about those topics to catchup.
創建者 Alexander S•
Aug 07, 2016
great course, but module 4 lacks a bit in structure. hard to follow. without the forum, it would not be possible to make it in time.
創建者 Baubak G•
Jul 11, 2018
Need more details in the coarse. I think many of the topics need more working on, and are not sufficiently described.
創建者 Valentina S•
Aug 16, 2016
Interesting content but explanations are less clear with respect to the other courses of the ML Specialization
創建者 Michael L•
Mar 18, 2017
slightly repetitive of classification course with no real use-case value except lots of math..
創建者 Volker H•
Jul 18, 2016
please rework in particular week 5, part 2
創建者 Nicolas I•
Aug 31, 2016
A little too superficial and hand waving.
創建者 Harsh A•
Jul 18, 2018
Too little "case-study" approach
創建者 Xiaosong L•
Aug 31, 2016
the homework is getting easy
創建者 Pan W•
Jan 03, 2017
I give 5 star for the teacher, really approach having such a well-organized teaching material.
I also give -1 star for the homework assignment and its (almost) GraphLab only approach. Yes, it mentioned "alternative" approach (which is much more popular than GraphLab), but there are many bugs & trivial difficulties to get it through. With scikit-learn as a great open source package, the only reason (I suspect) to choose GraphLab is commercial purpose. For me, if the homework assignment is only instructed properly for loading data into Pandas, I can finish each programming assignment within 1 hour for sure using scikit learn; but now, it takes 30 minutes and I still cannot load the data correctly. I like to get a certificate, but it is not necessary and spending too much time is a waste on my time.
Sep 23, 2017
requires use of a programming library from a company that was sold and is unmaintained. Challenging to build the environment to run the homework code on my mac pro. An AMI is provided so you can try to do the assignments on a prebuilt machine. Anyway I've found the class quite a hassle.
創建者 Dario D G•
Jan 19, 2020
Organized decently, yet tools such as TuriCreate have been associated to a lot of problems with running the assignments. Additionally, it seemed very difficult to receive any sort of assistance if stuck with an assignment or tool.
創建者 Karl S•
Oct 11, 2016
For me, this course was disappointing. Here is why: First, the level, at which the course material is presented, is very low. It might be freshman level, but certainly not more. There are many buzzwords but no real explanations. The programming assignments are only doable because most of the work has been done by the people designing the assignments. There is very little left for the students. Furthermore, the procedures, that are already given, are not very well documented. Hence, a lot of guess work is required to figure out how things should work. Furthermore, little effort has been spent to structure the procedures that are already given. Altogether, this makes doing the programming assignments very unsatisfying.
Finally, the professor presenting the materials does not take part in the discussion forums. Contrary to other courses that I have attended at Coursera, this time the discussion forum was no help at all.
創建者 Kripakaran R•
Nov 12, 2018
I wish week4 and week5 were better. It felt so rushed, where most of the important things were covered.
Jan 04, 2017
This specialization is delayed for months now - very annoying! Don't give them money!