Chevron Left
返回到 Logic for Economists

學生對 阿姆斯特丹大学 提供的 Logic for Economists 的評價和反饋

4.4
201 個評分
49 條評論

課程概述

This course provides a very brief introduction to basic mathematical concepts like propositional and predicate logic, set theory, the number system, and proof techniques. At the end of the course, students will be able to (1) detect the logical structure behind simple puzzles (2) be able to manipulate logical expressions (3) explain the connection between logic and set theory (4) explain the differences between natural, integer, rational, real and complex numbers (5) recognise different basic proof techniques...

熱門審閱

CJ
2019年12月17日

This was a testing introduction, but I found it very useful to getting to grips with the basics of logic. I very much enjoyed the assignments presented and hope to revisit them at some point.

NS
2020年6月13日

This course is really helpful and informative but it lacks to provide practice sums and course should have suggested some preference book which can be helpful for problem-solving.

篩選依據:

26 - Logic for Economists 的 48 個評論(共 48 個)

創建者 KOYA R N

2020年10月8日

Good

創建者 Manoj K S

2020年5月31日

Good

創建者 Teresa C

2020年8月22日

Lots of good info and examples of applying logic.

I've always regarded myself as a strongly logical thinker but I found this course very challenging based on more mathematical complexities.

While the processes involved in solving these complex problems was quite well presented, retaining those theoretical processes and applying them to other problems is a whole other challenge. Hopefully I will find the time to work through these videos a few more times over the coming weeks and months to gain a better understanding of the math involved.

創建者 Aarjav T

2020年8月15日

The course content is really great. It provides a comprehensive and quick overview of all the logical arguments out there. The only criticism I have with the course is that the number of practice questions is a bit on a lower side. Also, a pyramid based learning pattern is not strongly adhered to, which might upset a few learners.

創建者 Ellie P

2020年6月11日

The course was great, the lectures are super helpful however the assessments are poorly worded and the automatic grading system doesn’t work the best. However you can repeat the assignments as many times as necessary so it’s not the biggest issue and the information learnt in the lessons is very valuable and well taught.

創建者 Johannes d W

2020年8月31日

It is a short, but informative course. For me, a philosophy student who wanted to renew my knowledge of propositional logic and predicate logic, the logical foundations of mathematics, taught in week 2 were a bit too challenging. I did however manage to pass the final test without a problem.

創建者 Sebin B N

2020年10月7日

The course approaches the material well and explains it well. But, the problem sets are much harder than the level of discussion in the videos. Overall, I found the course challenging.

創建者 samuel c j

2020年7月4日

It was great, it reviews some important concepts in propositional logic and methods for formal proofs. But it was a short course and intermediate level more than advanced one.

創建者 Tanmoy C

2020年7月26日

Content is good but more elaboration would be more helpful .. Logic part is very difficult but though it is explained well.

創建者 george w

2020年10月27日

TIGER AND LADY PROBLEM MAY NEED MOR EEXAMPLES.

創建者 Young

2020年8月18日

It's a little bit short.

創建者 Sachin S

2020年10月5日

Very good

創建者 Dr. R S

2020年6月6日

Excellent

創建者 Dr V V

2020年6月20日

nil

創建者 Sean M

2020年6月25日

I found this course to be only okay - definitely lower quality than other courses I've taken on Coursera. The lectures were decent and I definitely learned about logic, although they were very dry and slow. The assignments are poorly worded, which can be particularly important when you're trying to solve a logic problem where the meaning can change depending on the wording. Some assignments also didn't provide sufficient feedback for you to learn from it if you didn't get it perfectly right.

創建者 Fred V

2020年7月17日

Handwriting on a blackboard: slows the rhythm, and not always fully legible. Would there be an issue with using good old PowerPoint? The course should address a few more topics of observational economics, such as logic of statistical inference, rather than axiomatic of basic mathematics.

創建者 Omar K

2021年4月29日

This course has a lot of potential for economists (especially for economics students). However, the course does not provide enough resources, the videos are not enough, and there is absolutely no reading material provided. I had to learn the theory by searching in Google.

創建者 André A

2021年1月2日

It is a good course, very basic, it tries to cover complex topics but does it in a very superficial way. In my opinion the idea of the course is more than interesting, but it should be a bit broader and dealt with in greater depth

創建者 Lizette J J

2020年9月24日

The video lectures need improvements but overall, this course in informative.

創建者 Amy C

2020年8月16日

the video lectures are not that good.

創建者 Ridhi N V

2020年6月4日

Good

創建者 guz d

2021年11月17日

Quiz is so much harder than what is covered through the courses. 2nd question in the quiz is wrong I think, and the 6th question is irrelevant with the courses focus. Overall, the course was okay, but the questions need to be more clear and they should have 1 obvious answer rather than 2-3 or more answers

創建者 Andrew U

2021年12月28日

Way too abstruse even for someone like myself who has studied critical reasoning. The course must decide if it is a beginner or advanced course and presupposes too much knowledge. I suggest extending it over several weeks.