I really liked the course and the contents are great. Except for the language problem, everything else is very good, and really enjoyed learning from peers and instructors. Thank you for the platform.
The content was very good and explanation was excellent just there was a slight problem with instructors accent but don't worry you will get used to it no time but the course is excellent and helpful
創建者 Maya S•
The course contains some interesting insights on writing a scientific paper. What I like about the course is that it is given by graduate students. But this is also a drawback. Sometimes, the material seems too simplistic.
創建者 Massimiliano B•
I would suggest to be more simple and effective. Discuss concrete cases and details of a about errors and structure of a paper. But really appreciate that the cours is given from PHDs students!
創建者 Syed W H N•
The content was fine and went pretty smoothly. The real problem was the hassle of getting the accent of most of the instructors. Plus, there're a lot of mistakes in the subtitles as well.
創建者 Sultan B M•
Good course for PHD students. Also, it can be beneficial for non academic papers which intended to be submitted industrial conferences.
創建者 Yasser A A•
The content of the course is good but the review process need to be improved. The assignments should be reviewed by the instructors
創建者 Ar S S u R•
INITIAL PEER GRADING WAS NOT VERY MATURE ENOUGH IN GRADING MY ASSIGNMENT SERIOUSLY..
創建者 Carlos R S J•
It is good, but there is a student speaking that is really difficult to understand.
Exteremely good course for those who r doing research ....Thanks to whole Team.
創建者 Joseph V B B•
It is very good for undergraduate students starting their research projects
創建者 Debyani R•
Please make it easier to understand the peer-grade assignment and process.
創建者 Derrick G•
not very useful because there are few examples of it.
創建者 Wisam A W•
A good summary on how to start thinking research!
創建者 David E F G•
The grading is a mess. The content is good.
創建者 Vincentius A B•
Somewhat not really practical
創建者 Olga T•
創建者 Ravindra M•
創建者 Mohsan U A•
創建者 Ranakishore P•
創建者 Prodromos V•
Too basic, especially when considering "it was written from PhD students for PhD students". The course lacks substance and the advice is too general and intuitive (for master of PhD students which of course as mentioned is the targeted audience of this course). I would much rather recommend "Writing in the Sciences" - this is what this course should have been (however note that that writing in the sciences is teaches principles through medical articles).
創建者 Zandro A•
I higly recommend to revise the scoring rubrics for the assignment -checklist. I dont see it fare to give between 75 and 100 for the score to the fact that we made an effort doing the checklist better to other options such as 80 or 85 orchange the checlist instead since wehave different style in making a checklist. Thanks and more power still a good and interesting course
A laughable course and very poorly prepared, almost a complete waste of time if not for the final exercise
創建者 Adlirrahman A M•
The course is great but the peer reviews by other participant are horrible
創建者 ABDULLAH B•
Excellent course for PHD students only.
創建者 Helena V B•
This review is not about the course itself but the unenrollment.
I am not able to unenroll this course which is kind of annoying because I am not able to follow this course due to personal reasons. So I would like to unenroll but it is not possible which is kind of stupid.
I do think this is a great course for PhD students, but not for me since I'm not even close to a PhD
創建者 Mona A E E•
language is not clear as English isnt the original language of the instructor .Really I cant completee the course as i cant understand their accent at all