This was a wonderful and very mathematically intensive course, but completing all the quizzes gave a great sense of accomplishment and developed my understanding of game theory and its various facets.
Very interesting! One missing thing: please write explanations for correct/incorrect questions in quizzes. In the basic course, I found them very helpful in understanding why my reasoning was wrong.
Overall, the course was good. Somehow, the concepts were not as clear as the basic game theory course. Definitely more advanced.
創建者 Ryan B•
A good class with a good formal description and examples of game theoretic concepts.
創建者 Koa Y•
Great course, I was really overdue but am hoping to get a certificate if possible
創建者 Affandi I•
Great course, but I think It could be more vivid like its predecessor
創建者 Roland R•
Great Course, same parts are challenging but i learned a lot about
創建者 Hushan J•
it's better to give explanations of the quiz when it is passed.
創建者 Daniel A M S•
It was nice to have a second part with more specific subjects.
創建者 Arshia S•
This course gave me amazing insight into game theory.
創建者 Muhua X•
It is very challenging but also interesting
創建者 carlo p•
Excellent skills obtained
創建者 Mufizul I•
創建者 Fred V•
Auction theory is left to the last lecture, and the influence of voting systems on political mechanisms is barely addressed. 3 different people lecturing, with different communication skills and flaws (hesitations, over-notating, abuse of acronyms), make following the course more difficult than it needs to be. These being said, it is clear that the authors more than know their stuff (at least the theoretical part; we would like to see them perform when bargaining in a souk) and bring a lot into the course.
創建者 Cigdem K•
The exams did not explain why the wrong answers are wrong. Even after you succeed a test, I expect an explanation of the questions, and the correct answers. Even if I have a correct answer to a question, I don't know if my reasoning is correct..
創建者 Telmo J P P•
Interesting, but not as good as part I. Some parts of the syllabus were not explained well enough: a lot of results just come out of thin air, and not a lot of intuitions are given.
Diverse course, which covered various topics. For the election processes however one could some illegal practices, which also could lead to a win. A democratic win...
創建者 Martín B•
Should have much more real examples. Voting schemes was right, but mechanism design was completely abstract
創建者 Carlos F S T•
No es tan bueno como el primero. Sin embargo, tomarlo como continuación es interesante.
創建者 Jeppe v P•
Interesting material, but sometimes hard to follow the lectures.
創建者 Edmund L•
The beginning of this course was interesting much like Game Theory I, but the latter half of the course went over my head. It would have been helpful if problem sets and exam are given explanations after submission similar to how it was done in Game Theory I. Sometimes I have no idea how particular answers are obtained.
創建者 Mohammad Z•
poorly explained lectures. you're better off reading a textbook