Chevron Left
返回到 流行病学:基础公共卫生科学

學生對 北卡罗莱纳大学教堂山分校 提供的 流行病学:基础公共卫生科学 的評價和反饋

4.6
3,764 個評分
1,016 條評論

課程概述

Often called “the cornerstone” of public health, epidemiology is the study of the distribution and determinants of diseases, health conditions, or events among populations and the application of that study to control health problems. By applying the concepts learned in this course to current public health problems and issues, students will understand the practice of epidemiology as it relates to real life and makes for a better appreciation of public health programs and policies. This course explores public health issues like cardiovascular and infectious diseases – both locally and globally – through the lens of epidemiology....

熱門審閱

N
2020年4月11日

Very clear teaching strategies from the instructors. Some quizzes though are a little bit hard on my part because of the type of questions and answers. But overall it is a great course to take with.

TW
2021年6月17日

I just completed my course and I would like to appreciate the tutors for doing a great job, yeah! Also, I recommend Coursera for anyone who wants to experience advancement in knowledge and career.

篩選依據:

976 - 流行病学:基础公共卫生科学 的 1000 個評論(共 1,012 個)

創建者 Clio H

2020年6月1日

Informative but boring lecture videos and very little exciting updates to the world of epidemiology (only touches on public health problems and solutions from 20th century).

創建者 Kathy C

2020年11月30日

It would have been helpful to have a reference section apart from the weeks that would list some key terms and the multiple formulas for calculating ratios, odds, etc.

創建者 BARAIYA D H 1

2020年4月29日

It was very informative. But few things were difficult to understand in week 2 and 3 could you simplify so that it would be easy for future students.

創建者 Saskia A

2021年5月18日

Good introduction to epidemiology. Quizzes are useless, however, If the quizzes were simply re-done, then the whole course would be better.

創建者 Jackson N

2020年5月27日

Very educational but a little hard to follow. Also these tests are too hard for beginners. Overall though it was OK, I rate it 3.5 stars.

創建者 Jeremiah N

2020年4月19日

Quizzes are difficult especially week 2 quiz. The flow of the discussion and topics are good. Professors were great! I learned a lot!

創建者 Tomás G G

2020年4月28日

It was nice, but nothing incredible. A standard introduction course, it sets basic tools for getting started with the subject

創建者 Suzi

2016年9月14日

Although the content was informational, the presenters were uninteresting and made watching the videos hard to do.

創建者 MARYAM H

2019年1月15日

It was informational and started with the basics. It was overall a good course but needs to be more interactive.

創建者 Nikita S

2017年9月12日

I wish we went in depth a bit. The overview was a bit vague and didn't instruct very well.

創建者 Vivek S

2020年7月25日

Very Slow and highly information-only course. It could've been more enthusiastic and fun.

創建者 Ibrahim B

2018年6月13日

The quiz questions were tricky and the modules were not as easy to follow as I thought.

創建者 Brent A

2015年8月11日

It was a good basic intro into the statistical methods of epidemiology. Quite basic.

創建者 Ignacio R

2016年1月25日

It is an interesting course, as a first contact with epidemiology and public health

創建者 Sezin E

2020年5月17日

Lectures are taught very fast, but still informative if you pay attention

創建者 Susan G D

2019年8月7日

This MOOC was quite detailed and i enjoyed every bit of the subject.

創建者 XIANGYU S

2020年11月12日

No bad. But the quiz are too difficult for me .

創建者 MODUPE O

2020年10月12日

Some of the content was not clearly explained.

創建者 Aryan S

2020年6月22日

dWdAWdAWdAWdAWdAWdawdawwa I cant unenrollllll

創建者 Taiwo I

2020年4月24日

Great learning opportunity

創建者 David c

2020年4月2日

content did not match test

創建者 Wei T H

2020年5月22日

In the earlier weeks terminology was introduced that were unexplained (the measures of association) even though it was stated in the lecture that these were "previously covered". This prompted me to search back desperately to see what I have missed to no avail, finally culminating in me simply looking up the terminology online. As it turns out, these terminology were explained in a subsequent week. Had this been conveyed or structured better, the course would have been easier to understand. Also the material was pretty surface level when discussing causality. In terms of presentation skills, it would help if the lecturers fumbled less with their scripts structured the content better. However, it is good effort and the content is fairly important, especially during these times where fake medical information is rife.

創建者 Victoria D

2018年5月8日

Lectures start from irritating music and book-ended by unnecessary summary of what will be and was studied. Lots of complicated language without explanation such as "osteoclast reabsorbtion reduction". Tests are impossible to pass. They ask questions not covered in lectures, lots of multiple choices where one incorrect tick shoots down the whole question. I can see from forums that some questions are contradictory - there is no correct answer. A missed opportunity.

創建者 Emine O

2021年5月11日

Quiz questions were really hard and tricky.

創建者 John W

2015年12月29日

poorly done