.

ك

I was disappointed at the lack of human editing applied to the transcripts, which are riddled with AI-transcription errors, and with the typographical and punctuation errors in the quizzes. This gives an unprofessional appearance to the material and to the University of Minnesota and detracts from the good information that is being shared.

The content of this course was excellent and the instructor was very good and well into the subjects. However, often I found it hard keeping up with the instructor verbally and the written content was not making good sense. Thank you

My favorite of the 4 topics, but a bit disjointed, both within presentations and from one to the other. Some material was too basic as well. Overall, still good and Larry is a likeable guy

It is way too repetitive and although it is shorter than the other courses of this specialization (HRM: HR for People Managers) it seemed to be much longer.

I learned a lot during the first part of each week. I do think the course is very redundant/ repetitive. However, I did enjoy it.

It contained some useful information but many of them seemed quite general and repetitive in some cases.

it's a good starting point, quite basic and can't compare to the other courses.

Even the course is interesting, in my opinion some subjects are too repetitive

The scoring of the Peer Review, was not really measurable of your effort.

Lecture voice is not clear. Improve the presentation method

quite lengthy and repetitive. but a good course.

scope for improving instruction design.

didn't gain the expected development , course should not be linked with other attendees for assessing , it was a waist of effort and time

good