The course was simple and crisp yet covered it all - interaction, visual and usability. Liked the duration of the videos followed by reading material that covered the highlights of the topic.
The basic principles of design and their philosophies were covered well in this course, and it was taught in a quick, efficient manner. I liked undergoing this course and would recommend it.
創建者 Tony F•
創建者 Felipe A•
創建者 Sandy B•
創建者 Mohansing P•
創建者 yashar k s•
創建者 Fan R•
創建者 Cinthy P R L•
創建者 Manorama D•
創建者 Jingyi G•
創建者 Shirley S•
創建者 Kevin M•
創建者 Albina D•
創建者 Saputra B I•
創建者 deepika j•
創建者 Siddharth P S•
Great overview of a lot of design topics! Like Scott himself says, this is a great starting point for someone who is not a designer himself. Not sure if it is feasible, but some of the topics could be more detailed. Yes - Scott does mention books that can be referred for further reading. But if the course could include pull-outs / key chapters from those books - it could be very useful as I am not sure how many of us will get a chance to go through complete books.
Overall - loved the exposure. Especially enjoyed the part on designing experiments.
創建者 Vazgen B•
This is a great course with tons of valuable info. The peer-review projects are very hands-on, and you learn a lot by doing that. However, I wish there were more explanations for certain things (for example, for the experiments section) - or at least, more resources to get further info. Also, for Assignment 3, it would have been very helpful to have the answer key, since there is some confusion around some of the answers.
創建者 Jeff M•
Overall the information and exercises were good. The introduction to A/B testing was great and provides a good base layer of knowledge for the experimenting and analysis section of the IxD program. I would say that the week 3 assignment was frustrating as a grader since the rubric seemed to ask for very specific answers when the questions allowed for broader interpretation.
創建者 Azusa W•
The exercises are very confusing to submit and to rate (peer rate review, sometimes too long questions and you lot the commitment). I would like that the teacher had a much linear methodology through the Specialization, in many moments it feels like he´s losing the objectivity.
It would be nice to reinforce the main concepts, instead of doing mathematic equations...
創建者 Ryan J•
The Chi Square lecture was hard to follow. I took elementary statistics in college 20 years ago and got an A, but the lecture jumped and skipped explaining things. the video seemed to have been edited when Scott was about to explain something. Sometimes he didn't really explain somethings. The other lectures were very helpful and have helped me already.
創建者 Nima P•
I believe the valuable principles methods in this course would be very useful when this course is placed after courses that already taught students how to navigate through the design process up to prototyping.
When it's like this once one completed prototyping courses and is ready to test their prototypes they should come back and review this course.