Chevron Left
返回到 Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment

學生對 纽约州立大学布法罗分校 提供的 Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment 的評價和反饋

4.7
227 個評分

課程概述

As robots evolve and increasingly interact with humans, enhancing the safety of personnel working with these “collaborative robots” (cobots) is vital. This course equips you to assess the safety of a collaborative robot workcell and prevent the chances of injury or harm. It imparts industry-endorsed safety standards, technical report recommendations and best practices from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Robotic Industries Association (RIA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Learners are introduced to similarities and differences between traditional robots, cobots and conventional machinery before delving into risk assessments, causes of robot accidents and collaborative applications. Material also includes key design techniques for reducing collision forces and a methodology for safety testing. Main concepts are delivered through videos, demos and hands-on exercises. To learn more, please watch the overview video by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-NU710WjM0....

熱門審閱

MK

2020年11月10日

excellent course , and this course really enhance my knowledge and give me new area for deeply study of cobots . I thank full to all professors and his team . regards

VP

2020年6月11日

It was an excellent knowledge gathering exercise. The course was well structured and there is good level of guidance for learning and implementation in the course.

篩選依據:

51 - Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment 的 68 個評論(共 68 個)

創建者 AndreA O

2020年12月19日

The course provides general safety principles for collaborative robots. I find it very useful to know which is the general framework, understand the basic safety elements and have notable references. Very good.

創建者 mohit s

2019年11月24日

This course is quite good but only thing I felt uncomfortable is about standards taught as they are very tidious to remember

創建者 Amanda B V

2022年3月11日

Interesting content, very technical. It's too focused on design however. I would have liked some more operational content.

創建者 Vladimir I

2021年7月31日

Good course, a lot of useful and helpful information, but it is quite superficial and lacks practical challenges.

創建者 Gabriel F

2019年10月1日

Very good information, tests were not proofread, but everything else was very helpful.

創建者 David M

2019年8月9日

This course provides an excellent presentation of useful information and methods.

創建者 Kedar P

2020年5月3日

Please Provide more Visual notes and points like a slide show while speaking.

創建者 Muslim A

2020年6月24日

Great Course and meet industry standards

創建者 chanakya j

2020年5月27日

very good and useful content

創建者 siddharth a m R

2020年4月29日

good course

創建者 Faisal A D A

2021年10月9日

helpful

創建者 CHANDRASHEKAR G V

2020年5月7日

GOOD

創建者 Don W

2020年4月30日

This is an interesting, informative course on a very specific subject. It gives a very good overview of the use of robots which interact in the same areas as people. However, the course appears to be orphaned. The forums point out a few dead links and exam question errors, but no one from the course has responded in over a year.

創建者 Ankit S

2020年5月30日

The course was okay.

The instructor was good.

though, i expected to learn some programming for safety parameters which were not at all covered in this course. This is an improvement that i would suggest.

創建者 Arun U

2021年8月4日

Great learning objectives. But poor delivery. Most of the referred articles are heavily paid articles or unavailable. The resources are not reviewed over years. Speakers are monotonous.

創建者 SARAANSH S

2021年4月20日

Basic course for developing your knowledge about collaborative robots. Hazards related to it and some mitigation methods.

創建者 M.R N D

2020年9月16日

Good course

創建者 Jessica N

2020年2月17日

The transcripts for the videos are clearly not reviewed and include word substitution errors that could possibly be made by software or by someone who has English as a second language and erroneously selected a similar-sounding word. In some cases, you can figure out what is trying to be conveyed, but in other cases it's pretty confusing. Some of the additional resources are just advertisements from companies trying to sell their robots. Some of the additional resources links don't work. Some of the questions in the quizzes make no sense, partly because of incorrect word substitutions. Other issues include a yes/no question in week 4 where the "yes" answer and the "no" answer each provided an explanation after either the yes or the no... but the yes and the no were attached to the wrong explanations, thus causing the answers to be illogical and false. Another question asks about an arm being pinned by a robot, but the answer it wants is the answer for the user's palm being pinned. The palm is mentioned in the question, but the arm is the part the question says is pinned- so the answer the test wants is not the answer the question asks. The video in week 4 is terrible, and doesn't really effectively answer the question associated with it.