學生對 宾夕法尼亚大学 提供的 Ancient Philosophy: Aristotle and His Successors 的評價和反饋
課程概述
熱門審閱
Excellent course, Pr. Sauvé-Meyer keeps the material very engaging, and makes it very clear and easily accessible. Knowing how difficult the original texts are sometimes, this is very valuable.
This is an excellent course. The lecturer presents the material very clearly, carefully bringing out what is at stake in the views and arguments of the Greek thinkers and schools she considers.
126 - Ancient Philosophy: Aristotle and His Successors 的 150 個評論（共 173 個）
創建者 Kacper G
•Clara Non Sunt Interpretanda
創建者 Joanna C
•Interesting and informative.
創建者 Charlotta S R
•great course ( part e of 2)
創建者 John V T
•Very Exceptional Course
創建者 Zhou X
•Short and sweat course!
創建者 William
•
An enlightening course
創建者 ELISABETH S
•more than great!!!
創建者 Stephen W
•Wonderful course!
創建者 Wes D S
•Loved the course!
創建者 Cédric H
•Excellent course.
創建者 Luyao Z
•Great class!
創建者 Matthew V
•I loved it!
創建者 Paul C
•Superb. En
創建者 Abdulaziz S B
•Excellent
創建者 Kim n y
•v
e
r
y
good
創建者 Jorge G
•Superb!
創建者 이근영
•Cool
創建者 Rajneesh T
•NA
創建者 박기현
•g
創建者 Charles E M
•G
創建者 William ( A
•Great job organizing and presenting this material. Assuming you are open to hear of possible ways to improve on an already great job, my suggestion would be to expand the Aristotle material a bit and include a discussion of his work developing syllogistic logic. In addition I believe there is an important contrast between Aristotle and Plato it would be worth illuminating-- Plato was all about deductive reasoning, and it was Aristotle, in turning Plato's worldview upside down by declaring that we can trust our senses-- i.e. it is the observable concretes that are the true source of reality and "unrecallable" knowledge. One could argue from this that the genesis of empirical research rests with Aristotle.
創建者 Antonia T B
•The course is nice but it's a pity that the professor didn't start with Aristotle's ethics (which is the coolest part of his philosophy in my opinion). The first part of the course was extremely boring. The parts about Epicurus and Stoicism were very interesting. The final assignments are nor being reviewed. I finished the course and I'm still waiting to get my Certificate. That's very annoying. Also, there are no Mentors replying. That's a pity. Greetings / Antonia
創建者 Eshana B
•Not being a prior student of philosophy, or rather arts, I had a very different idea about this discipline. After taking the first week's course, I am pretty much enthusiastic about what is yet to come and look forward to learning more.
The course content seems good for me as an introduction.
Wish it included some more realistic examples from life which we can find witty and can relate to our lives.
創建者 Kenneth M
•Clearly presented.course which focuses only on the principal question and themes of each of the 4 philosophies. I found it extremely valuable as it structured in a logical way these issues and also related themt modern life. My only criticism relates to the grading method of the final assignment 0 or 1 is far too simplistic.
創建者 Harvey
•I really enjoyed the content and how well it was delivered. She really knows what she is talking about! My only constructive comment would be to somehow make for real-time discussion between students ... after all, we are talking philosophy here. As we have seen with the virus the technology certainly exists.
Coursera Footer
