Very useful to know different tecniques for software project/product

planning. Although some of those tecniques are (in my opinion) not

very relevant in an Agile environment (like work breakdown structures,

pert or gant charts) the course is good to learn how to use those tools

and also to ask ourselves whether or not they are actually relevant or useful if we follow the Agile approach.

Great course! Good reading material was offered in the first week. All works were important to fix the given content.

Two negative aspects, in my opinion, were: 1) the PERT class because I never heard of this feature being used in agile projects. 2) in the discussion forum people do not discuss the content and only post requests for peer reviews.

In the end for me, it was worth it!

It is a good refresher course with a reasonably good content, however the lack of reviewers for peer reviewed assignments is bit frustrating. I have completed the entire course and passed all the tests, however the course still shows in progress due to lack of availability of peers to review the assignments.

I would prefer to give 4.5 stars out of 5 here, because the course was overall good. One peer-reviewed assignment was particularly confusing, in that its rubric did not match with its description. I cannot give the course full marks because of that.

Great examples used in course videos. The Course Notes might be a worked on a bit more in terms of models and examples, but they are quite extensive and an invaluable resource. Teaching staff is quick to respond to forum questions, which is great!

My least favorite part of the course, but it was still put together well. Content just isn't as interesting as the rest of the specialization. Felt a bit too "Project Manager' instead of the Product Manager.

It is excellent course in terms of the knowledge that I gain. However the multiple choice questions are a little bit default to understand. It is look like that you are examining our English skill :)

In some of the assignments, the marking rubrics specify requirements that weren't outlined in the initial question, which I thought was a little unfair, but not a big deal.

Lots of well structured content, easy to follow and informative. You know it's the tip of a large iceberg, so it's a very good way to start and let you wanting for more.

This course has the minimal information than its brother courses, you may need to add more details focus on the planning more and give more assignment if applicable.

I am Krishna Kant Kumar, working as a software quality analyst.

Through this course, I learnt, how to estimate an iteration or doing an estimation of project.

Great an simple daily use tools for us as managers, dev team leads and event developers themselves to understand how to move and support teams internally.

Really nice course. I was expecting a little more depth, but I really enjoyed the approach they took and their assignments.

Nice course. Decent content and always well-structured lectures. The peer assignments could have been better though.

Some part of learning material not concern to agile planning, for exampe absolutly not mentioned kanban planing.

Preparation for planning task was not sufficient and assessment criteria not fully transparent beforehand

Questions in tests need to have better context or worded better. There is ambiguity in interpretation.

Not the best, but if you are a newbie in management field you can find valuable information inside.

Very good course. I'd like there to be more real life examples and exercises though.

I think some estimation methods are not really realistic

Alright. But doesn't go very deep into the subject.

Room for improvement:

-Case studies

-More Assignment

Good information about agile methods

Simple and good way of teaching

A lot of new knowledge for me